Windows 10 end of life could prompt torrent of e-waste as 240 million devices set for scrapheap::As Windows 10 end of life approaches, analysts are concerned that millions of devices will be scrapped due to incompatibility

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    of course no mention of upcycling these with linux and getting them into needy hands. with alll the solid state hardware now many of these machines are perfectly functional, and will be for some time. its the batteries that likely need a looking at

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, personal computers can only ever work with Windows. I just love that the common thinking process just accepted that problems, especially IT problems, can only ever be solved by 5 gigacorps.

      BTW a lot of these will not even be laptops, I imagine they won’t even need much. If Windows was a proper system by the way, they could be still supplied with security updates by third parties.

      Also, I’ve seen Rufus claiming to be able to remove the TPM requirement from the installer. I didn’t test it though.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Let’s go back to 1995, you’re a corporate IT manager or C-class executive , responsible for deploying desktops, laptops, to 10,000+ employees (I worked for or with several companies like this at the time).

        You need directory services, email, app deployment. You also need common office apps, like word processing, spreadsheets, etc.

        Your end users are finance folks, regulatory compliance teams (i.e. legal), marketing, etc, who’ve been working with systems that are purpose-built for their roles (mainframe/IBM As series for finance, print layout systems for marketing, etc), with not everyone really using email much.

        Suddenly you have an opportunity to migrate everyone to a general purpose system that’s pretty easy to understand, and many people already have some familiarity with. You can eliminate sending handbooks to everyone by building your own intranet which people can access with IE. Your HR systems (which are still on mainframes/AS-400) can now be accessed by IE from anywhere in the company, so time entry, vacation, benefits changes, etc, reduce time and paper consumption dramatically.

        Theres a million reasons why companies embraced Windows back then. Standardized UI for everything massively improved support capability. Being able to take output from legacy systems and present it better either via IE or custom-built apps made for significant training reduction, and could even reduce password management difficulties, and increase password compliance/security for the legacy systems (I saw one custom app in 1996 that presaged SSO by managing logins to 11 backend systems).

        There was nothing in the *Nix world at the time that could compete with the whole package that Windows/Exchange offered, for the user management and end-user ease-of-use. Especially since you could retain your legacy systems and use Windows as both Windows and as a terminal if needed, and provide app flexibility for end users.

        Then there’s the productivity side, there were already tons of Windows apps available, with many more on the way. And people were familiar with how to use them, because of a standard interface. Also, many people were using Windows at home or school, so we’re familiar with it.

        Just compare Word to Wordperfect at the time. I’m not sure WP was even a GUI yet (I forget when they added it). So legal folks were fast as hell with WP, but your average user wasn’t, and it had a bit of a learning curve. Compare that to the menu-driven, WYSIWYG Word Perfect.

        Now look at the SMB space, where money is even tighter. It’s much easier to deploy and manage an exchange/windows setup for 50 users than what, setup a Unix system? I could teach someone to do day-to-day Exchange admin stuff in a few hours, because GUI is way easier than command line for people who are new/inexperienced, because it reveals the concepts/paradigms. And Exchange ran on fairly generic hardware. Again, they didn’t have to buy something like an AS400.

        Unix folks just didn’t see what was coming for some reason. I remember Unix admins disparaging Windows as a “toy” in the early/mid 90’s. Even today I couldn’t imagine selling a Linux setup to most companies, as mature is it’s gotten.

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I love all your ibm as400 examples in your 95 throwback when I still use them and maintain a half dozen power 7 and up units running as500 now lol (casino industry, gaming systems run on as400, payroll on as400, only got the hotel management system off the as400 this year)

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          I hate linking my account to the OS it is a pure balls. It wants my log in to open my computer and then when I added my uni log in it somehow disabled the PIN ability.

      • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        TPM isn’t the only requirement, for example my 2020 hp laptop has TPM 2.0 support but can’t install Windows 11 because of terrible driver support.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      My AMD computer still runs great for what I use it for and will continue for a good several years. It’s got a 6gb 1060 (that I’ll probably upgrade a bit pretty soon), 32GB ddr4, and what magically won’t officially run on w11: a ryzon 5 1600x I have OC’d to 4Ghz.

      Once win 10 goes out (which no one kid themselves, it will 100% get a support extension) I’ll mainly swap over to Linux and run 11 unofficially for the couple things I’d need it for.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Cool, I need some cheap Linux servers to build out my home lab

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    11 months ago

    High-end corporate laptops from 5-10 years ago make excellent cheap and powerful Linux machines today (given a reconditioned battery, assuming you want to run them without mains, and a new SSD several times larger than the hard drive they came with). See all the sticker-festooned Thinkpads you see at conferences that spent the first few years of their lives handling executive email and PowerPoint presentations, now living their best lives.

    • Odelay42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve always wanted to do this.

      What’s a good source to buy them?

      What models do you recommend?

      • CosmicGiraffe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve always got them from eBay.

        The T and X series are the high-end ones. Between those it mostly depends on what size of laptop you’re looking for. Its worth checking a guide for how you replace the SSD/RAM/battery - some of the newer ones have these soldered in place, which means you’re stuck with whatever it originally came with.

        Personally, I think the sweet spot is around 4 years old. By that point they’re pretty cheap (maybe 10% of the original RRP), and going for older ones doesn’t save you much more money. I recently got an X390 and it’s doing everything I need from a laptop

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I just brought a thinkpad home from work for that purpose the other day. Gonna keep an eye out for a newer one in the coming year

  • GreenBottles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Windows 10 should not require such a short life time. 11 isnt much different other than the security\TPM chip shit. And 11 is fucking terrible UX

    • Josh@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      I like that it’s completely arbitrary and you can force windows 11 to install on unsupported hardware.

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        In one sense, I’m glad they put this stupid barrier up so that I don’t have to keep deleting the forced upgrade as part of regular Windows Updates like I did with Win10, but on the other hand it’s bullshit that they’re creating so much waste for no other reason than personal profit for their company.

      • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        You just need to set a couple of registry bypasses and you can upgrade any Computer to Windows 11. Downside is that some security features won’t work, but its not a big deal for consumers.

    • biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not to boast MS, but its service life is longer than Linux at 10 years. Lts on Linux is generally at best 8. Ltsc on Windows is much longer. Windows 10 released on 2015 and the ltsc ends at 2027 on the enterprise channel, or 2025 for the consumer general availability.

      I’m only commenting because I dislike misinformation more than I dislike MS.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      TPM 2.0 will be over 10 years old at that point, I’m pretty sure most of the hardware they’re talking about will have been retired by then no matter the support for Windows 10.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        It might be 10 years old, but it’s not widely deployed until a few years ago, just like how Wayland is 15 years old but only recently starting to see widespread use.

      • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I built a $1500 pc 6 years ago that doesn’t have a tpm. One gpu upgrade and this thing still does everything I want it for, including running modern games and VR with entirely acceptable performance. When windows 10 stops getting security updates, I’m just going to install arch on it.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It was on everything Intel starting in October 2017 (8th gen) and a year later it started on AMD’s consumer grade hardware with full integration in 2019 (3000 series)…

          So 11 years after it started existing W10 stops receiving free updates, 10 years after the tech was fully integrated W10 stops receiving free and paid updates… And that’s not taking into consideration that W11 can still be installed on unsupported hardware…

          • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I must have missed the cutoff by a couple of months. But here’s the thing: that cpu is still more than enough to drive 60fps on all the games I play, which includes typically demanding categories like fps, while running discord and YouTube and recording software. So the fact that Microsoft decided to fuck me over feels bad. TPM is garbage design from the hardware up, but I know to run secure workloads in secure places already.

            The right thing to do should have been to force oem-licensed win11 to have TPM, and allowed retail versions to install with a pop up about security features which won’t be supported without it. Fuck Microsoft for not doing this obvious, simple thing.

  • newcockroach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Where can i get this waste .my linux pengiun will love it🤩.but it saddens me that people relay on windows so much.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This is corporate talk, no ones work station is going to be running Linux anytime soon.

      Oh yeah everyone, tell me where you work with Linux?

        • variants@possumpat.io
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Our company doesnt usually allow linux other than our products. If we run a linux machine they want us to run this funky command that opens a backdoor for them lol after all the yearly trainings about how we arent supposed to do sketchy things like that. We still use linux machines because our windows machines are so locked down we cant do much with them but dont tell IT

          • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            Corporate IT requires a backdoor on all systems, the only thing sticking out is how automated they can make that on windows and macOS. And they do need that backdoor, so that they can check on and force patches so that you don’t end up with anyone else’s backdoor. Pretty reasonable when you really think about it.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Pretty crazy that my company does similar with Macs. When I started, my manager assigned me a Windows laptop, but it is so locked down that you can’t do anything technical. I eventually insisted on the Mac and life is easier simply because they let you do more

      • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Large ISP, in the global operations computing department. I am an exception to the rule though. I mostly touch network gear and *NIX servers so I’m not limited to Linux but I will say most of our *NIX stuff is RHEL now and doesn’t even boot past run level three so it’s all CLI.

  • pixelscience@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    All these machines will continue to run, so if they’re not going to upgrade to win 11 and buy a new machine then what does it matter. They’ll just use a win 10 machine with no updates forever. Security concerns aside obviously.

    • TheBob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s corporations. Mine is currently replacing like 30% of our PCs because they’re not Windows 11 ready.

  • wabafee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This will be interesting, maybe this will push for huge adoption for linux. This could also mean a lot of old hardware that are still very capable goes to 2nd hand market in turn lowering prices for pc. Or nothing happens and most of the people will be in a compromise OS for years similar to what happen with windows xp debacle. There also another situation where Microsoft does backtrack on its decision and the same status quo would remain for years to come.

    • cyberpunk007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I am hoping for this but unless Microsoft puts a banner on 10 saying you should switch because x,y,z I don’t see it happening for a majority because a lot of people probably don’t even know how to install windows from scratch.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Google should be pushing ChromeOS towards people and businesses with this kind of hardware. It’s a perfect way to capture market share from Microsoft.

    • Noerttipertti@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nah. Google decides to ban your account for whatever reason, and your files and mails are gone, and you can’t even login to your computer. Linux is just as easy as windows nowadays, and in some cases even better for gaming.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I can’t upgrade to W11, I can’t afford nor am I ready to upgrade my gaming PC, its likely I’ll be moving to Linux or keeping to use W10 w/o support.

    Microsoft really did no favors with limiting official W11 support. Its not just TPM.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I migrated to linux when Windows 7 died. So I’m you from years ago, lol.

      If you’d like any advice, I would just say check ProtonDB for the games you regularly play (especially if they are MMOs) to make sure they work, cause anything that uses restrictive kernal level anticheats arent going to run.

      and if you are looking for a distro, I would personally recommend Nobara. it stays up to date, it has a lot of the gaming stuff built in (Some of which might require compiling from github otherwise), and its been rock solid for me personally. but you should poke around and find whatever tickles your fancy… and anything you don’t get from X, that you can get from Y, can usually be manually installed on Z.

    • thejodie@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This obviously doesn’t solve any of the larger problem about MS pushing TPM, but you can bypass most of those W11 requirements.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    How many non-tech people actually know about this? And how many of that small percentage are actually going to toss their computer as a result of it?

    Because for the average computer user, they will never wonder why there are no more updates. And as long as their computer still browses the internet they don’t care even if you notify them.

    Microsoft tried for years to get people off of fucking internet explorer and barely succeeded.

      • notannpc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        You underestimate people’s ability to dismiss pop ups and notifications without retaining any of the information in them.

    • eluvatar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, no one actually cares. Just look at phones, people don’t actually stop using them when they aren’t supported and don’t care as long as it keeps working.

    • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I expect there to be a lot of nagging. MS doesn’t want to miss out on all the Windows 11 licences they can sell with new hardware.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    Incompatibility with what? Things are only just starting to be incompatible with Windows 7. I’ve still got customers running variants of Windows XP.

    And Windows 11 doesn’t really contain much that won’t work on 10.

    I reckon the TPM and secure boot requirements will eventually be dropped. They’re the Kinect of Windows 11.

    • hamid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You’re probably not correct about TPM and secure boot being dropped. Microsoft’s entire enterprise line of security products including Intune and Defender for Endpoint are integrated to it and Microsoft Azure AD/Entra ID uses it for their certificate based enrollment and authentication. This is their primary profit drivers, not consumers.

      • Rednax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Disabling the tpm requirement is just a registry hack in win 10, or a selectable option when creating an install usb with rufus.

        I think they will make a simple calculation; What is going to cost more: The bad PR of nolonger updating 240 million pc’s, or accepting that a small portion of your users does not have tpm?

        They haven’t stopped advanced users from installing win11 on older hardware so far. So no loss there. I also doubt they lose enterprise money if they allow win10 to upgrade regardless, as tpm is now well entrenched as the default on new hardware.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m still not even sure why they decided to require TPM anyways. But yeah my computer is among the many that can’t upgrade until that’s gone. I guess it’s either that or I learn a lot more about Linux…

      • jdaxe@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        At least if you switch to Linux there’s no shortage of people on the fediverse willing to answer questions.

        • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          There should be a “Linux hotline” community where people can post whatever is stopping them from switching and get solutions

          • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            Elsewhere, Linux support areas seem more likely than not to have a large contingent of “WHY ARE YOU ASKING A DUMB QUESTION, you horror of a human being? Why didn’t you Search the site for words you don’t know using our broken search engine, instead of infecting us with your congenital idiocy?” folks.

            • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              exactly, I admit to sharing some of the “bro its so easy” attitude, but that should result in simple answers instead of berating, like a “no stupid questions” but for linux thing

              • Pazuzu@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                A “no stupid questions” for Linux would be super helpful. A big one for me is shell commands. Like are shell commands different between distros, or do I have to install something to have certain commands? How do I even know what commands I do have?

                • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Like are shell commands different between distros, or do I have to install something to have certain commands?

                  Yes and no, kinda. So the most popular shell by far is Bash, which includes its own built in functions, and can also be extended with custom functions which certain distros may include in your bash config file by default. But generally, Bash and the GNU coreutils are standard, although some more “hip” distros will include other shell prompts such as zsh or fish by default, but even those tend to come with bash for script compatibility or easy switching for user preference. Some distros may include programs by default, but most of the time those are easily available in other distros through the package manager.

                  How do I even know what commands I do have?

                  compgen -c (or compgen -c | more for a scrollable list (press q to exit)) should do the trick, but that is a built-in bash command that may not be available on other shells, but generally you can find all the programs able to be called from shell inside the

                  /bin

                  /sbin

                  /usr/bin

                  and

                  /usr/sbin

                  directories. All these directories are added to a variable called $PATH, and when you type a command into your shell, these are the places that get searched for a matching program to run. You can use echo $PATH to see all the directories on your machine which are searched, or even add your own directory containing custom scripts or utilities so you can use them anywhere like an installed program.

      • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Going the linux way can be troublesome at first, but you will be free from ms bullshit in the long run and will have your hardware lasting much longer. Unless you need something specific to windows for work, I recommend trying linux.