Some Apple users say its parental controls aren’t working properly. A CEO who has 4 kids called it ‘frustrating.’::Parents told The Wall Street Journal they have to continuously check their Screen Time settings to ensure their children’s usage is limited.

      • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean, it’s still a somewhat useful headline, though.

        It tells us “a person who isn’t good with technology can’t use this feature”

        So, we need to make the feature simpler, or not bother with it

        • MarsAgainstVenus@fedimav.win
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I had the same exact thought! BI definitely meant it as “This very smart and important person thinks this should change” but in reality what it really means is “this person who doesn’t understand technology thinks the software isn’t simple enough.”

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Either that or the kids found workarounds. I never had to deal with any of this myself, but I remember that being pretty common back in the day. Some you could even just ctrl+alt+del and close it in the task manager, do what you wanted, then open it back up to make it look like nothing had changed, though the parents would have to be technically competent to some degree to even check for that.

          I think the systems these days are better but probably still aren’t foolproof. Decent chance one of the kids even shoulder surfed or otherwise figured out the password, or maybe just found the parent’s device unsecured and removed the limitations, which would be consistent with the claims of setting them one day then a few days later they are just gone.

    • sunbytes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      “a golfing buddy of someone senior at the newspaper who we didn’t want to just call ‘area man’”

    • Ogmios@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well they don’t care about problems until they affect their own families, so there’s that at least.

  • Coeus@coeus.sbs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why are the opinions of some random CEO of a company that isn’t even named even in this article? It is irrelevant and doesn’t even make me want to read the article.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The assumption is that CEOs are smart. In reality that’s not always the case. The person the article mentioned could be a total nut job lol I think that pillow guy is a CEO right? Did they ask him what he thought about it?

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve read stories about IT/security people setting up a good secure system and then being told by some c-suite executive that it’s too hard and to either give them an exception that might allow them to reuse some simple password or maybe walk it back to a less secure system for everyone.

        Edit: plus on internet forums, anyone can be a CEO. I’m not a CEO but I am a space admiral and if any news outlet wants to quote me for this or any other post, I insist they refer to me as “an annonymous space admiral”.

  • duckCityComplex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The other frustrating thing about Apple’s parental controls is that you need another Apple device to use them. Good old fashioned brand lock-in. No good reason you couldn’t manage this in a browser.

      • Streetdog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Help keep your family safer online”

        So you rather let Google track your whole family? You can’t say you care for privacy while using Google services, it’s a contradiction.

        And their walled garden is even trying to DRM the web.

  • FoxBJK@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t rely on Silicon Valley to babysit your child. All software has flaws, and a kid who wants to watch more YouTube videos will figure out a way because there’s probably a dozen videos out there detailing each bug.

    V-Chips didn’t do shit in my era, and we found ways around Bess, so none of this surprises me.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you have kids? I can tell you as a parent that parental controls are godsend.

      If I were to try to do the same myself, it would be 10-15 arguments a day. When the software does it, there is no argument or very little. Sometimes they ask for more, and I can evaluate their case. Much better than chasing them around trying to tear the iPad out of their hands.

      All that being said, I’ve had to use other 3rd party software because Apple’s parental controls are buggy and unreliable.

      • Freeman@lemmy.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My 5 year old is already sneaky enough that when I put him on starfall he will wait for me to get distracted and chnage tabs and type gibberish into search, or click the YouTube icon in chrome and do the same (which is more dangerous, YouTube has some really weird shit if you search special characters).

        I alsready have dns controls on network etc and generally manage access by physically retaining control of a device. M

        But as they get older adding some level of content filter that’s https aware may be needed.

        Though as an IT admin I’ll try and rely on trust and communication over technology solutions. But still. Like borderline planning to dump them on their own vlan, with a Pi-hole and some extra filters, that also goes to Cisco umbrella and some sort of squid guard/sensei setup on my opnsense router or even websense or palo alto filter.

        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Keep trying, you will figure it out. Obviously you need to physically monitor as well as use tools. But my teenager finally gave up trying after I thwarted numerous attempts at circumventing the limit.

          • Freeman@lemmy.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean. I’m a admin by trade. Ran systems for a bank that had multiple cascading products.

            It’s more philosophical choice. I can easily setup blockades they would be hard pressed to thwart even as a teen.

            Part of me wants to challenge them like I was to bypass them. Part of me wants to teach them to be responsible and practice good secuirty on the net

            • realitista@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Part of me wants to challenge them like I was to bypass them. Part of me wants to teach them to be responsible and practice good secuirty on the net

              I feel exactly the same.

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The alternative solution is to not give your kid a phone at all. Having been down the cat and mouse games with blocking, I can tell you that’s the only thing that works. The problem is that most schools require technology use, paper maps and public phones are non-existent, social pressure, etc. Pinwheel is the most nerfed smartphone for parents who want to limit their kids phone use but it’s a weird subset of Android, doesn’t nicely fit into Apple ecosystems, but effective if you need that.

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How can the kid watch videos on how to watch more videos when they are blocked from watching videos?

      • FoxBJK@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Hmm… I wonder if Mom’s password to unlock the iPad is the same as her pin code for… holy shit is she really this stupid!?”

        Or if that’s not enough, here’s my lazy attempt to see what the options are: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZaMNsGSvRE

        Imagine if I put more than 10 seconds of thought into this.

        • MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You probably don’t have kids so you don’t understand how valuable parental controls are. /s

          There are a few parents in this thread showing their ignorance.

  • Knasen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Screen time limits hasn’t been working for months, have had several support cases in regards to it, debugging and logs sent to Apple and nothing.

    Second to last time they actually admitted to having problems with the function (accidentally I am sure since I can bet money on that they aren’t allowed to admitting to faults).

    Have just given up on the function now

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It works on my 2 boys’ but not on my daughter’s. Good thing is she told me it wasn’t working and still followed the rules by not using it after a certain time of day. She’s a great kid. On the other hand, both of my boys would have totally abused it.

  • NormalC@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The mainstream tech/software industry was built on abusive tactics and nonfree software. The only thing I can recommend to people is to de-productize their computers and try to use free software whenever possible.

    Even if you control what a child sees/uses on a apple device, you’re still perpetuating the injustice of apple’s products and now setting up that child to use their products in the future. In essence, you’re stripping the child’s software freedom in the end.

    The youth of the generations after us need to be educated on their fundamental software freedoms, and how the loss of those freedoms leads to endangerment.

    You may feel fine forfeitting your software freedom, but it’s an injustice to do that onto others especially preteens and teens.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously. Parental controls are no substitute for being a parent. They’re not too difficult to circumvent, anyway; just ask 10-year-old me.

  • Lumberjacked@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have three kids. I am very present. I work from home and I’m constantly monitoring what they are using . Parental controls are a nightmare.

    There are apps that are rated as ages 4+ but they have chat features.

    There are apps you’ve ok’d them to use but requires the parents PIN every time they open it.

    Screen limits randomly reset themselves. A lot of times that means you have allowed something that limit blocked and now you have to ok it again.

    Imagine being out with three friends and you need to know everything they are doing on their phone and have to enter a password on it every 15 min.

    • onesweetmullet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Another annoying thing is if you approve an app from the App Store once, it’s approved for install forever.

      Going off what you had mentioned about apps with chat features, we’ve run into times where we’ll approve the app thinking it’s fine, but then our kid finds out they can chat with random strangers and divulge personal information. At that point we delete the app, but they can reinstall it whenever they want without requiring parental approval again. 😬

      • picklepod@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You need to do this on their device, but you can go to the App Store, then purchase history and “hide” it. This makes them ask for approval to redownload.

      • iDunnoBro@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whether or not I do, they won’t be “raised” by slipping into a YouTube Kids coma 24/7 unsupervised.

        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yes, spoken with the surety and confidence of someone who has never navigated the waters of raising kids in the modern world. It must be nice to live in a perfect world inside your own mind.

          • iDunnoBro@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It sounds like you think that you know a lot about me. Please tell me more.

            It’s definitely not a self report to be defensive when no one said anything specifically about you before losing your shit and taking things personally.

  • revs@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do some parenting? Not just leave them alone with gadgets if you don’t want them on them all day.

    • duckCityComplex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are involved parents who still want to use parental controls. It’s not like everyone who uses the controls is relying solely on them. It’s not an all-or-nothing proposition.

      • MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re going to need a more original/thoughtful response. I have kids and I think like this person. I don’t trust parental controls, kids and content creators know how to get around them. I, personally, think it is idiotic to assume parental controls do more than present a barrier to content, not usually a blocker.

        What happens when your kids use other devices without parental controls at a friend’s house or school? Will your kids know about being responsible with content and how to navigate to safe spaces, or are they just going to go totally wild?

        So, yes, I do have kids and no I do not blindly trust parental controls of any sort. Just want you to pack up that argument right now. Real annoying when parents think they can discredit a viable view because the person they are talking to hasn’t had a crotch goblin.