TikTok has been pushing Chinese propaganda to millions of users in Europe: analysis::More than 1,000 ads from Chinese state media outlets have run on European users’ TikTok feeds since October 2022, according to the platform’s latest ad library update that was analyzed by Forbes.

  • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Downvote everything from that fuckin rag. Don’t post NYPost here. If there’s a story, find a news source that doesn’t itself have an outrageous history of propagandizing.

  • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    See that other article on the NYPost next to this one? A guy turned himself into a border collie? He’s a dog now and it only cost $20,000.

    Great news source. No problems here. Not click bait garbage at all. Nope, not meant for maximum sharing. Thanks L4sBot for your contribution.

    • 𝙣𝙪𝙠𝙚@yah.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In the first paragraph:

      TikTok has flooded millions of Europeans with ads from Chinese state propaganda outlets on topics like COVID-19 and tourism in the troubled Xinjiang region, according to an analysis of a recent ad library conducted by Forbes.

  • drewofdoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not saying it’s a lie, but sourcing from NYPost is automatically a huge red flag.

    I’ll put more stock in this when it’s reported by reputable outlets.

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Breaking news! Chinese company runs ads paid for by Chinese government! Did anyone think otherwise? All governments pay for ads. Who in their right mind would think a Chinese company would refuse their government as an ad customer?

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ads are one thing but state propaganda is something different. In a US political context this would be like the State of Florida running “Ads” on Facebook discussing how slavery was actually beneficial to the slaves. Get it now?

  • QubaXR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    TikTok is garbage, but perhaps we should look at all the ridiculous right wing propaganda pushed by YouTube, Facebook and Twicough X

    • Tesco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      YouTube is absolutely dreadful for it. I have literally zero interest in American politics, I’m interested in world events but frankly couldn’t care less about another country’s domestic politics yet it’s pushed almost every time I load the site.

      I mostly watch things like travel vlogs and trip reports, yet get endless spam about right wing American politics. There’s nothing in my search history that would suggest I’d care about it.

  • Max_Power@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah well Orwell’s 1984 was way off then. The government does not even have to force people to install devices in their homes that blare government propaganda 24/7. They are doing it willingly, enthusiastiacally even, and they don’t even have to be citizens of that government lol

    Who would have thought?

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The NYPost (low-quality tabloid) is just echoing an actual article at Forbes, which can also be accessed in archive form here.

    In general, when a low-quality tabloid site merely reports on the existence of research done by actual reporters, it’s better to follow the links and post the researched article instead of the tabloid one.

  • forrcaho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, yeah, it’s Chinese government propaganda, but isn’t all advertisement basically propaganda? “Everything is rosy in Xinjiang” is a harmful lie, but so is “if you buy a big-ass truck you’ll be a manly man” and frankly I think the latter is causing a lot more damage because it’s one that people act on.

  • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How to detect if it’s propaganda : I push propaganda you will not push propaganda we push propaganda they will not push propaganda.

    I = my country

    you = other country

    We = my friends and me

    They = their friends and them.

      • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ll simplify :

        USA sharing propaganda via it’s social media companies to Europe and others = good thing.

        China sharing propaganda via it’s social to Europe and others = bad thing.

        In other terms : how dare they do the thing we’ve been doing ?

        • ThoughtGoblin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who in the world said western state propaganda was a good thing? Military recruitment and political ads are pretty universally hated.

          I might also add that western tech giants and media aren’t directly owned by the state, nor is the state a dictatorship, so it’s a little different? You think Elon’s Twitter is on the same side as Bidens Executive is on the same side as the conservative Congress?

          • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            America not being a dictatorship doesn’t a matter to anyone else besides it’s citizens. All the fucking world want is for America to not invade, destabilize, destroy the economy of other countries, which surprise surprise it’s been fucking doing none stop since the end of WW2 !!

            Do you really think the gouvernement doesn’t inject propaganda on social media ? Are you this naive ? It’s how you call “corruption” and “buying politicians” as “lobbying”. They don’t control it like a dictatorship would but they do control media.

            • ThoughtGoblin@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              America not being a dictatorship doesn’t a matter to anyone else besides it’s citizens.

              Most American allies depend on the US for defense, the US is the largest economy in the world, and the US is the largest ideological counterpart to countries like Russia - who want to use force to annihilate both dissent and opposition.

              It absolutely matters to most well-informed citizens of any country the world over how we conduct ourselves because it does directly impact them. That’s part of the reason we should be better than we are.

              The… world want [sic]… for America to not…

              I mean, you’re preaching to the choir. Most folk here didn’t want to send their kids to die in 'Nam or Afghanistan. Vets didn’t sign up to risk their lives for opium fields. American citizens were duped too.

              We’re on the same side here.

              Do you really think the gouvernement doesn’t inject propaganda on social media ?

              I didn’t say that, but they take out ad campaigns and use PR firms like a normal company. Twitter does not work for the US government and the US government does not rig the algorithm it uses for feeds. The Washington Post is not controlled by the US government. Amazon is not controlled by the US government.

              The distinction between that and what China or Russia does is important. They own the media. They own the companies. They own every method of communication and every interaction between their people. And they leverage that direct power to control narratives to say things like “Taiwan belongs to China” and “Ukraine belongs to Russia” and “Tianemen Square never happened”.

              Meanwhile, you can see all the atrocities the US government did on Wikipedia. Sometimes even on the websites of the state itself. Reparations are discussed, sometimes won. Protesters fight with, yes, the risk of state violence, but not of tanks turning them into pudding that’s washed down the gutters. And with that knowledge, we can shape our own future democratically. Putin and Xi cannot be voted out.

              All this is a long-winded way to say:

              • The US government engages in propaganda.
              • The US government’s propaganda, compared to authoritarian states, is heavily restricted and far more reliant on consensual participation. It’s also widely criticized and (almost) universally hated.
              • The propaganda used by authoritarian states like China is actively leveraged to commit outright genocide and deny atrocities. It cannot be publicly criticized or opposed.
              • Therefore, the scale and impact of propaganda is different and that difference must be considered.
  • 99nights@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No big surprise here. It’s been their agenda since the start. Only consumers are fucking stupid for taking it in.

    • outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Moreover, how is anyone sitting in America (or a country with American bases) primarily concerned about the Chinese government? We have endless military and culture war/ propaganda barriers erected against them; we’re basically untouchable, unless we plan on physically going to China.

      (The answer is related to the propaganda barriers themselves – it’s acceptable / encouraged to criticize China).

      • steltek@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you describe what “propaganda barriers” means? From my perspective, it’s absurdly easy for foreign governments to bot-farm posts in an attempt to sway public opinion in the US.

        And of course it’s acceptable/encouraged to criticize China. But it’s also acceptable/encouraged to criticize Joe Biden, Donald Trump, AOC, DeSantis, Obama, and on and on. There’s not really a shortage of hateful and divisive content out there right now. The rage-bait about what The Other Team just did and how America is in terminal decay are the biggest propaganda wins of all time. And news orgs, desperate for revenue in an age of digital media and ad blockers, will chase whatever is stuck in people’s heads so they fuel it even more.

    • ABC123itsEASY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re not necessarily wrong in all respects, but this comment is peak whataboutism. Western tiktok is targeted mostly at children and young adults who are obviously highly impressionable, so I would argue that regardless of whats happening on any other social media platform, this is unwanted and harmful and therefore shouldn’t be accepted.

      • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are children and young adults really more impressionable than Fox news, and thereby Facebook’s, audience?

        I also don’t know that I agree with “targeted mostly at children and young adults”. There are very large parts of TikTok that would be wholly unappealing to your average kid. Not to mention that American social media started out very much targeted at children and young adults. Or have we already forgotten what the main demographics of Facebook and myspace used to be?

        The problem with whataboutism here is that these conversations pretty much always involve TikTok and rarely other platforms until it’s brought up in comments where it can be dismissed as whataboutism.

        Either they’re all a problem (it’s this one) or none of them are. We need to stop drawing arbitrary lines between offenders. It’s just giving a bunch of shit bags freedom to continue being shit bags.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are children and young adults really more impressionable than Fox news

          Fox News isn’t being paid by the Federal or State Governments to run “Ads” that attempt to put a positive spin on negative events.

          • RatMaster@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Suuuure. Not paid directly by the gov, but unless you’ve been living under a rock, everyone knows that politicians and big corporations (or in this case: Fox News) work hand in hand to push propaganda… Or like you said “put a positive spin on negative events”.

            People just like to jump on TikTok and be like CHINA BAD!. As if America was an angel lmao.

            • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              WTF is wrong with you? China is running ads trying to convince people that they’re not really genociding the Uyghur Muslims they’re just detaining them to send them all to school!

              As if America was an angel lmao.

              I never said it was, again WTF is wrong with you in your head? Criticizing one group doesn’t equate to support for an opposing group.

          • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Does it count when a major political party, that does that all the time, uses the money it pilfered from that government, or is that different somehow?

            What about that the only reason they’re not doing it directly from the government account is because of the safeguards against that kind of thing they haven’t pulled down yet

            • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              A political party is not the Government nor do their ads attempt to whitewash Government misdeeds.

              • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                A political party makes up parts of the government and uses their ads to whitewash their own actions within the government.

                This division is not at clean as you’re trying to make it

          • Historical_General@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oftentimes they’re connected to party members mate. Trump literally spoke to a bunch of their broadcasters daily.

            • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Was the US Federal Government paying Fox News to run ads talking about how the mass murder of American Indians was a good thing?

              No? Then GTFO out of here with this whataboutism. It’s fucking gross.

              • Historical_General@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The same people fund both the government (through elections) and the news media. I guarantee you Murdoch is friends with many of his fellow billionaires.

                L

      • charles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The difference is there is American federal policy being put in place around TikTok specifically that is not being done against other social media apps.

        • ABC123itsEASY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yea when people organize an attempted coup on Chinese tiktok, your point may hold more water. Not saying it’s a good thing, but it’s clear that Facebook et al’s primary motive is not promoting nationalistic goals; domestically or aboard.

  • nxfsi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is no currently no actual evidence that TikTok is a threat to national security, but consider this:

    1. TikTok is owned by Chinese company
    2. All large Chinese companies are required to have Party members in the board, making them defacto state-run
    3. PR China is currently committing genocide, large-scale espionage, subversion of foreign countries and all sorts of fun stuff associated with authoritarian fascist dictatorships
  • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Propaganda is alive and well in the USA too, especially if you consider it in the most liberal sense.

    There’s an incredible amount of advertising in the media telling me what I need to think about any issue you can imagine. Most people just ignore it, but it annoys the crap out of me. I’ll make up own damn mind, thank you.

    This is a modern development, you never saw that crap forty years ago. I’m old enough to remember the before time. Most of it I can avoid simply by not watching commercial TV and blocking ads on the internet. Though sometimes it squeaks through on the TV and it makes me want to throw a chair at it.

    When I do have the misfortune of seeing that garbage it’s usually on TV and has an Ad Council logo on it. Who are these people and how are they able to egregiously spend the large amounts of money it takes to repeat ads on TV like that. That’s a lot of money consumed in a futile attempt to brainwash me through repetition.

    They could take that same ad money and actually use it to provide relief for some important social issues, like starving children. Instead they’d rather use it to try and influence my opinion in a futile way. Man that is really fucked up when you think about it.