• potat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Isn’t this the same broken AI that has been striking youtube videos about Minecraft clients? Why is every company suddenly using this?

    Edit: Yes it is. I really don’t know what to say anymore. Imagine applying youtube’s broken copyright system to the entire internet, but even worse.

  • nfms@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    1 month ago

    Energy wasted to create an AI image to have more energy wasted to have an AI remove it. I’d say this is a win for AI

      • nfms@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I forgot the “/s” at the end 😀.
        But on that point, Nintendo’s actions are making it more difficult for me to play on my switch.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 month ago

    Flood the net with photos and make their AI work overtime costing them lots

    • Broken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Flood it with AI copies of official Mario content. Train the copyright software to associate the context of the official art to get the official art taken down.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Mario detection tool seems to be catching fan art in the crossfire, too.

    That’s the actual headline.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why does the title specify that the tool is taking down “AI-generated” pictures if the article focuses on how it’s taking down fan art indiscriminately?

  • Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    Two can play that game. I bet it is possible to create an AI tool that generates and posts Mario pictures faster than they can take them down. Why you’d want to do that I don’t know.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Every time I think shitendo can’t get any worse, they prove me wrong. I hate that company so much. They are like a rich brat kid with a toy he is telling everyone not to touch. Fuck off already

  • Shadywack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I just want to see Nintendo go after all the Rule34 stuff. It might be the one thing that could exhaust their resources.

  • bizarroland@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I thought AI generated pictures were automatically public domain and unable to be copyrighted?

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’ve got that the other way around. You can’t copyright AI generated pictures, but pictures created by AI can still be taken down as violations of copyright law.

    • wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think that’s how it works. If it exactly looks like something protected by laws like copyright or whatever your country uses, I highly doubt that any court would say that it’s fine just because it was created by AI.