This should be helpful for people that learned Photoshop in the past (for work or in school). From what I understand, a lot of the friction with GIMP is the workflow differences, and potentially unintuitive UI/UX choices.

tldr: recovering Adobe Photoshop user shows you features in the very free and very open source gnu image manipulation program :D

my relevant GIMP config files: https://github.com/BreadOnPenguins/dots/tree/master/.config/GIMP/3.0

GIMP documentation: https://www.gimp.org/docs/

    • Ardens@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well, if you can’t make a circle in GIMP, then you have quite a lot to learn. I just asked my kid who’s 7, and she easily makes a circle. She would like to show me all the shapes she makes in a minute or two… When I asked her, she made a square, rectangle, triangle, drop, circle, star, lightning, oval, cros and a few more, where she named them all… She had fun doing it, so thanks for that… But please, go practice. BTW I like Krita too - I just don’t feel the need to blame any tool for being different from another. :-)

      Can I ask you… how often do you really draw a circle, for this to be an issue?

      Here’s a little guide. My daughter uses the selection tool, to make a lot of shapes… ;-)

      https://thegimptutorials.com/how-to-draw-circle/

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The first two sets of instructions are for drawing a disc, rather than a circle (a disc being a filled-in circle) and don’t extend to drawing a circle easily. The last method does, but it is about 10x as long. The traditional method for drawing a circle was to select the inner circle, save the selection to a channel, grow the selection by the pixel width of the stroke you want, subtract the saved selection, then fill. Wonderful /s

        GIMP does not (unless I missed it in a ~recent update) have a shape tool like most image editors. The GIMP documentation in any case suggests using Inkscape for the purpose.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          GIMP apologists are what Adobe users think FOSS apologists are like. The principled refusal to even consider fundamental UX principles is astounding.

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah you might be right.

            I should clarify I use GIMP. A lot! But this is one way it sucks. By this point I don’t know what other similar programs even have over it - it finally got adjustment layers after some decades. So if I can recognise this shortcoming anyone should be able to ;)

            The other major thing was switching to single window mode. Floating windows for everything was absolutely batshit.

                • LeFantome@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Most Wayland compositors don not have the concept of multiple windows being one application. And you cannot always control how and where they appear.

                  This is not a Wayland complaint. Just pointing out that old GIMP was just not very compatible with the core Design of Wayland.

                  Depending on what compositor you use, a lot of this has really improved.

    • sga@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      there used to be more, but now news is the main thing.

      in olden times (of 2021), distro reviews/why linux is better/software showcase were the main things.

      there were folks like luke smith (not going to his political shit) would do demos for things like groff/troff (imagine a latex alternative, now it is pretty much only used for man pages). but you get the idea - they would demo software, use it, compare it.

      there is tle, who did lots of lists (like x amount of tools from elementary os which are great), linux cast would do file manager reviews, brodie would cover commandline stuff.

      now pretty much all 3 of them do news. I still watch brodie because his news at times is niche and kinda fun, but i really do not want to hear lkml drama (which is non existent).

      one of the youtubers which got me into linux was mental outlaw. he made tonnes of privacy/security/anonymity related videos back then, and occasional covered hacking news. i started trying to make windows more private (it truly started from try to make wwindows leaner), and then he, and tle got me into linux.

      now i do not watch almost any of them. (except brodie, and occasional tle and tlc)

      why all went to news - it is easier to make.