• Zinggi57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think a lot of people here don’t understand the danger of this fully and dismiss it with “Just use Firefox, problem solved”.
    Unfortunately, once this becomes widely available, that is once Chrome ships it, websites will start to use it.
    Maybe Amazon will just not sell to you anymore when you’re browsing with Firefox?
    Maybe YouTube wont serve any videos if you’re using Linux?
    Your bank will certainly implement this and only allow Windows 11 with Edge or some shit like that.
    Once this is implemented, we will all suffer, even if we’re using better alternatives right now.

    • Ember Ushi@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your bank will certainly implement this

      My brother in Christ, it was 2020 before my bank supported passwords longer than 8 characters. We have 30 or 40 years before we need to worry about the banks.

      • vaultdweler13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some banks are still running windows 98 internally, admitedly so long as said system isnt connected to the internet it should be fine.

        • erogenouswarzone@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol, not to mention Cobalt and other horrors that are lurking in Legacy systems no one has looked at in 50 years.

          I’m thinking mainframe terminals, where the character has to be in the right place on the screen in order to store something in RAM.

          Even worse, how many systems are still using punch cards? How often do those cards need to be replaced?

      • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you ever rooted an android phone?

        The google SafteyNet Attestation is the precursor to browser DRM. It’s essentially phone DRM.

        There are many banks that have apps that require you to pass at least the basic level attestation, if not the CTS profile matching that fails the moment you modify any system level resources, even the bootloader

        luckily you can force disable CTS so it falls back on the basic level, for most apps at least. You will never have access to Google or Samsung pay though, as it actually knows your phone model should support CTS and will autofail if it no longer reports that it does.

        Alongside that apps like Pokemon GO and Netflix also require at least basic attestation to function - demonstrating the DRM and anticheat capabilities of such a system.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, US banks.

        Banks in europe are much more up to date with tech.

        They have APIs to sink transactions with external providers like nordigen API.

        They have 2FA that is linked to your national identity card which is chipped

        Nationally used apps that are universal 2FA linked to national IDs that banks, medical, and government services all tap into

        Everything is contactless payment nowadays, the US just recently started contactless cards

        Inter-bank transfers without external apps like venmo

        There are MANY problems with EU people getting their banks to work on a rooted phone.

        They will absolutely implement DRM if someone sells the bullshit to them under the illusion of “safety.”

        Hell, the US had handwritten “vaccine cards” for covid while European nations even had open source user spinoffs on nationally funded apps linked to national IDs to manage COVID vaccination and testing passes.

    • Jentu@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would apple just roll over on this? Or would they fight to make sure safari is also an option to freely use the internet (or at least severely limiting apples ability to do something similar) And websites that depend on ads, the number of Firefox and safari users have to be greater than the number of users who use ad-blockers. So wouldn’t it negatively affect ad income on websites if they implemented it and cut out all non-chromium browsers?