• Kernal64@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    If NASA goes with Boeing for the rocket, they can expect the rocket to disassemble itself halfway into the atmosphere.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      6 months ago

      You assume it gets off the ground. Starliner is 4 years behind, hasn’t had a flawless automated launch yet, and still hasn’t launched a manned crew, while the SpaceX Dragon 2 has made 30+ trips to the ISS on a fraction of the development budget.

      • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Also assuming the FAA doesn’t ban Boeing from air/spacecraft production. But then again space-X has done unsanctioned launches so maybe the laws don’t matter if you’re making rockets.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          6 months ago

          SpaceX doesn’t have Elon to deal with.

          What are you talking about? Elon is all over SpaceX constantly. It’s easily one of the biggest critic complaints, just like every other Elon company.

          The difference however, is that SpaceX has Gwynne Shotwell, and she is able to keep things on track, even with Elon. That is something none of Elon’s other companies have an equivalent.

            • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              6 months ago

              No worries. SpaceX IMO is basically proof that Elon being involved is fine as long as he’s not actually the one in charge on a daily basis.

              There needs to be a Gwynne at every Elon company. But it seems that none of the other company Boards realize that.

          • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m pretty sure it’s an open secret that Elon isn’t really involved in SpaceX’s operations (except raising money and doing publicity) because of his drug use. Like, the military was very upset when he smoked weed with Joe Rogan and did a review and found he wasn’t as involved as he pretends.

          • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            Starship was still Elon’s brainchild and it is years behind, and threatens the viability of the entire Artemis program. Their finances are also terribly linked to the success of Starlink, which is also shaky at best.

            I would not say SpaceX is “on track.”

      • Hupf@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s project Orion all over again. The rocket will dump whistleblowers out back and nuke them as a means of propulsion.