It’s still bare-bones by most standards, but Notepad has evolved a lot recently.

  • cron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    But tabs were a great addon. Also, it can finally handle linux line endings (\n). Thats the two things I miss when using old versions of notepad.

    But a spell checker? Why?!

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Why?!

      It’s an opportunity to monitor the contents of the file, and your keystrokes.

      • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        also killing wordpad and putting features from that to notepad means one less program to maintain, less expenses

        • jcg@halubilo.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          How does the math work out on that? Both are fairly mature, I don’t believe that either application takes a considerable amount of development effort to maintain. And taking features from Wordpad and putting them into Notepad has a time and effort cost.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That carriage return that Windows sneaks in there has been the source of a lot of file-parsing problems for me when I forgot to catch that in my programs, because I develop on Linux and I’m not expecting it.

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Different OSes using different line endings is such a long standing and well known problem that I would only describe the bugs that come as a result as bad programming. Not even lazy programming, a lazy programmer uses a library that abstracts away these differences.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I program embedded devices. There’s not often just a ready to go library for what you want to do when you’re doing bare metal. You’re given a C compiler with the bare minimums, and that’s it. You’re expected to mostly build what you need by yourself. That includes file-parsing routines. A microcontroller doesn’t even have any idea what a filesystem is unless you build one. I gotta do all that myself with an SD card through low level SPI stuff.

          On general purpose OSes, yes, you have a plethora of frameworks and libraries to choose from. In this world, the cool stuff, like C++ Boost libraries for example, doesn’t exist.

          • bamboo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            On embedded devices, how often are you parsing input that came from notepad (or any other text editor)? If your device has a UI or a web server, you’re likely already using something that handles various encoding and line endings. If you’re reading data you included at build time, consider a validator/sanitizer script that can run in your build environment where it can have easy access to off the shelf libraries.

            On a side note- as a software engineer who primarily works on things running in a general purpose OS but does occasionally have to make small programs that can function on embedded devices (albeit still usually with an OS, think routers and iot), I’m glad that the Rust community takes no-std development seriously. Large swaths of the rust ecosystem is available even in embedded environments.