• e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    It is not really FUD to point out that Mozilla wastes ungodly amounts of money on projects of dubious utility instead of investing it into their browser. Their current trajectory doesn’t inspire much confidence either. Mozilla started to waste even more money on ‘AI’ features nobody asked for.

    • Mbourgon everywhere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Actually, their new AI thing is actually useful: stays on-device, and summarizes web pages and videos.

      But yes, they could stand to spend more money on the browser, and less on their CEO and other non-browser things.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          it’s a good idea to not look to deeply into the historic actions of the creator of llamafile. she’s pretty polarising.

        • Mbourgon everywhere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          I’ll be honest, when I first heard that Mozilla had come out with an AI I figured it was on the back of them trying a couple different ad scenarios, and assumed the worst. Pleasantly surprised by Orbit.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Mozilla doesn’t exist to fund Firefox. Firefox exists to fund Mozilla. It’s been that since the very fucking beginning: Mozilla is a general internet charity that makes money with a browser. It’s always been that way. It never has been any different. I may have to repeat myself: The purpose of Mozilla isn’t to fund Firefox the purpose of Firefox is to be a money-maker for Mozilla’s charitable causes.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        usually you invest in the main product to drive higher returns for diversifying. diversifying first means your baseline is unstable.