• DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    Oh, so we let Capitalism destroy the planet and the ability to easily grow crops …and then resort to running around in the heat doing cannibalism?.. do we know they were billionaires at this point, or is there just still enough meat on them to make them worth hunting?

    That’s the problem with post-Capitalist clarity, it leaves you in a really painful situation, and there may be no other destination possible. It nay be the only place Capitalism ends.

    That doesn’t even address whether there’s a market in human meat and wealthy traders… And how Capitalist that market started. Oh Capitalism may not have ended yet in this scenario…

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    23 days ago

    I just rewatched some Hawkeye episodes. I’m down with this. brb got to make some more special arrows.

  • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    23 days ago

    Feel like your chances of seeing one of the dozens of people who hold like half the wealth in the world is pretty slim on the street.

  • MissJinx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    I’m not against but I feel like we have to establish boundaries. Like how rich is rich game? Is a weathy dude huntable? What about people that won the lotery? I Imagine billionaires are the better target right?!

  • Routhinator@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    Now I need to see a photo shop of a Post brand cereal named Nut Clarity, with picture of fuzzy almonds floating in milk.

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    22 days ago

    I get the violent rhetoric, I really do. But, at the same time, I can’t help but feel like more people would be more amenable to social reform that benefits the little guy to the mere detriment of the rich, rather than murdering them horribly. I could be wrong, but doesn’t history teach us that violent revolution more often just begets more violence than actually solves problems?

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      but doesn’t history teach us that violent revolution more often just begets more violence than actually solves problems?

      Nope! Look at the life expectancy increases under socialist countries, they mathematically have less death!

      Also compare red terrors casualty numbers to standard operating casualty numbers. Like 20 million people die of capitalism caused deprivation a year worldwide today.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 days ago

      Ok but the rich, and tgerefore powerful will block said reform or even weaponize it. We’re at 40 years of losses for the little-guy. We’re down to the bone and they’re still cutting while the pigs still feed at the public through

    • ericatty@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      I mean, Kamala is running on policies that would help the little guy. And she might lose to guy who SA’s women and said he could shoot someone in the street.

      If she wins and we get a peaceful transfer of power, then I’ll have more faith in your dream.

      But right now, it seems like violence is what the masses crave over social reform.

    • dyc3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      I agree 100%. I’m as left as probably most people here, but I just don’t understand why the first course of action is to claw the opps eyes out.

      • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        I understand. I throw obscene amounts of money at the cash black hole that is rent. I understand entirely how people think that people who make money simply by sitting on assets they own and otherwise provide nothing to society should be, ahem, obliterated. I just think it’s still possible to obliterate them with regulations instead of actual murder.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      counterpoint:

      in all seriousness, no it doesn’t. that’s whitewashing by liberals. good revolutions are often still violent. because guess what, if you want to challenge power, power doesn’t just fucking let you do whatever you want.

      • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        power doesn’t just fucking let you do whatever you want.

        No, but power can be subverted. Maybe I’m hopelessly optimistic, but I think there’s still a non-violent solution.

  • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    22 days ago

    Lol!

    This fantasy you people have is nothing but sociopathy.

    What “rich” are you trying to kill and eat? Just, anyone that you have judged to have more than you have? It’s not like you will be able to get to the people at the very top. And what, you just murder those that you have labeled “rich” along the way?

    My brother makes more than I do. MUCH MORE. I would never want to see him and his family murdered by douche bags out of jealousy for the things he has been able to work hard to achieve. And he has worked hard all of his life to make it to where he is now!

    Do you guys have some sort of test to see who should and shouldn’t be murdered just because they have more than you do?

    You guys are fucking sick in the head!

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Why would you us a bow? Range is poor, and lethality is also low, esp. with the access the the ultra-wealthy have to medicine. When you hunt deer with a bow, you can usually expect to have to follow a blood trail, as it’s rarely an instant drop.

    Use a .300 Winchester magnum from 1000 yards; at that distance, you still have about 850 foot-pounds of energy, which is roughly double a 9mm at point black range. With the right ammo, that’s more than enough to get the job done. You probably want a combined mechanical and ammunition accuracy of about .5 MOA range though, so that you have deviation of less than 6" at that range. It’s a challenging shot, but it’s definitely doable if you know your holds and can call the wind.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        You shouldn’t need to. .300 Win mag is long action, so you’re going to be using a bolt action rifle. There’s not going to be too many contexts where you’re going to want to swap out the scope for anything other than fairly long range.

  • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    22 days ago

    You’re only allowed to have post-nut clarity in capitalism if you have earned a lot or better yet once you have a stable passive income. Otherwise, it’s money-horney talking in you.

    And most of the days that’s what lemmy sounds like “I never had sex, this attractive guy has slept with too many girls, we gotta make sure there’s an equal distribution of girls among all of us”.

    We can still talk about how that situation is unfair, but you’ll never convince me that you’re neither jealous nor horny.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      This is vibes based politics.

      No, an exploited class noticing their exploitation and some dude thinking he is entitled to having sex with women are not the same actually.

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 days ago

    I don’t know. Personally I’m a fan of Piyu style reeducation (or at least a more modern and humane version of it).