• millie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    404 demanding my private information to access their article about how I shouldn’t give my private information to companies.

    • lemming741@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have a fully automatic 2x18tb magic hard drive. I’m a member of 4 private trackers. I’ve been disabling JavaScript since I could click a mouse.

      404 are legit journalists and I pay the $8 a month because they do damn good work.

  • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    3 days ago

    I didn’t agree to shit. If I did agree it was probably because some company twisted my arm and didn’t offer a more respectable service that doesn’t gobble up every bit of data to resell possible. Probably through every mobile carrier.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 days ago

    Agreeing to location services for the purpose of performing the apps intended use, is not the same as agreeing that the government can track your location on a whim. Where the fuck are the constitutional lawyers who fight this kind of egregious constitutional violation?

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    We need protections limiting the length and level of effect of clickwrap agreements.

    For now, I will continue using “inspect element” to change the text “agree” to “disagree”, and completely skip proprietary phone apps.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They will justify what they want. The rules are made up, and the laws don’t matter.

    I’ve made my peace with the eventual gestapo knock on my door. If you haven’t, just stop using social media entirely but it’s probably to late if you can see this.

    Even not having an account is enough I would guess (I’m no computer wizard). Even wizards screw up a spell now and again (thanks computer wizards for your community service, I do love gaming a shitton and lemmy is Hella rad)

    IP addresses linked to threads opened, comments sections browsed can be used to create a profile by some dipshit AI programmed by some dipshit. Zero social media is the only way. Just don’t look at it.

    Just don’t look

    • The Doctor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Opting out of social media these days is considered inherently suspicious. It definitely came up the last time I had to undergo a background check for work.

        • The Doctor@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          They said straight up, “I googled you and couldn’t find a Twitter or Facebook account. What are you hiding?” I had to teach them who Armand Jean du Plessis was.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have a LinkedIn account. It has the list of recent jobs I’ve held and my education.

        That’s my social media presence.

        Things like Lemmy are my secondary presence that I keep anonymous.

        It’s never been an issue during my background checks. But then, if anyone ever dared to ask me about my lack of presence, I’d give them a level stare and tell them that I practice what I preach.