yes i did a os one but i am wondering what distros do you guys use and why,for me cachyos its fast,flexible,has aur(I loved how easy installing apps was) without tinkering.

  • Libb@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago
    • Debian + Xfce on the desktop, because it (mostly, see below) just works, it’s snappy, reliable, and I don’t need my apps being constantly updated (I have very simple needs and use cases)
    • Mint + Cinnamon on the laptop, because it’s still debian-based and because unlike Debian, Mint was able to connect my AirPods out of the box and I use them a lot when on the laptop… I also quickly learned to appreciate Cinnamon, I must say.

    edit: typos

  • woodgen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Arch.

    Because of pacman. Building and writing packages is simple and dependencies are slim. Also packages are recent. And most likely “there is an AUR package for that”. Also stack transitions arrive early, like pipewire.

    Also let’s not forget Arch Wiki, i bet you have read it as a non Arch user.

    I administer Arch on 8 machines including gaming rigs, home server, web server, kids laptop, wifes gaming desktop, audio workstation and machine learning rig and a bunch of dev laptops. I also use ArchARM on RPi for some home automation.

    Never considered switching since I switched from Ubuntu over 15 years ago.

    I do have experience with several other rpm and apt based distros.

  • bawb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Currently, Arch btw. I was on Ubuntu in the 12* days, but arch wiki had the solutions to every problem I encountered, so naturally migrated. I want to switch to NixOS but ran into some issues getting my finicky nvidia/amdgpu laptop to work. I might go blendOS as a holdover, it seems like a good mix of the two. Also I have some issues with Manjaro (tried for a while) but pamac cli at least handles all of my aur and pacman needs properly.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Different distros for different uses:

    • Debian with KDE for my casual servers and Docker boxes.
    • Nobara for my main gaming PC.
    • Linux Mint with Cinnamon for my general purpose PCs and my #JustWorks uses.
    • Arch for my pimp mobile test machines.
  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    NixOS & OpenWRT are my two. NixOS’s Nix language as declarative config is such a great tool for setting up & maintaining a machines for the long-term that despite the initial learning curve has paid off in the long run (Guix or a Nix successor should also be in the same category). OpenWRT is the purpose-built tool it is for having an OS for a router with low overhead & a UI that can be easier to understand the config when networking isn’t something you do on the regular.

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’m currently using bazzite due to its really solid out of the box support for gaming hardware and peripherals.

    I’m really surprised everyone uses arch. I have three theories as to why:

    1. There actually aren’t that many arch uses but when arch users have the opportunity they won’t hesitate to say “BTW I use arch” were as others don’t really bother.
    2. There are lots of arch users and everyone uses it because they want to be able to say “BTW I use arch”
    3. (Very unlikly) There are lots of arch users and it’s because it’s actually a good distro that people like.

    (This is mostly a joke jsyk I’m sure arch is a great distro)

    • kureta@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      In my experience, the only quirk of arch is its installation. pacman and the AUR are great and I really did not have any issues with stability. First time I tried arch I used a tiling window manager, custom menu bars and all that “hackerman” stuff, which was not stable at all and forced me to reconfigure and tweak my machine all day every day. Now I am using a full blown Gnome desktop environment and it is rock stable. My only wish is to have an /etc directory just like Intel Clear Linux.

  • lancalot@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    What distro do you use

    I daily drive secureblue.

    and why?

    Long story short; I love me some security. Unfortunately, My device is far from ideal for running Qubes OS. From within the remaining options, secureblue comes out on top for me.

  • Fatur_New@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I use LMDE. I use it because Mint has proved that it is worth using (for example: it provide easy way to install multimedia codec by only click “Install Multimedia Codec” in applications menu) and I want it to success.

    Sorry if my english is bad

  • cakey@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    im a notorious distro hopper lmao, right now i am using manjaro for the first time. previously i was using Pop OS where i had plasma installed for the DE rather than using cosmic or whatev they call it… but it seemed like there were a few issues between Pop and plasma, so i hopped to manjaro

    first time using a distro that uses pacman so there are a few growing pains for me

  • monovergent 🏁@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago
    • Debian stable (w/ XFCE). No-nonsense, excellent community support, well-documented, low-maintenance, and runs on anything so I can expect things to work the same way across all of my machines, old, new(ish), or virtual
    • Just flexible enough that I can customize it to my taste but not so open-ended that I have to agonize over every last config
    • It’s been around for many years and will be around for many more
    • I often entertain the idea of moving to Alpine or even BSD, but I can’t resist the software selection available on Debian
  • TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    MX Linux. It is Debian with setup and tools I really want but would be too lazy to prepare in one go. Love it as much as I love Debian.

  • the w@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bazzite (with KDE). My desktop is mostly for discord and gaming - I don’t have the kind of job that can be done from home. So when I get to use it I want it to just work, and look good.

    I’ve used a bunch of distros and I’ve sort of become an atomic evangelist. Which put like that sounds like a great band name.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    EndeavorOS. Because I wanted to have a rolling release distribution that is always up to date, and one that is good supported by maintainers and community. Good documentation is very important to me. And I trust the team behind EndeavorOS and Archlinux.

    Also the manual approach of many things and the package manager based on Archlinux is very nice. I also like the building of custom packages that is then installed with the package manager (basically my own AUR package). The focus on terminal stuff without too much bloat by default is also a huge plus.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I didn’t say “personal package manager”. Do you refer to the part “basically my own AUR package”? pacman, the package manager of Archlinux that is also used in EndeavourOS, allows for installing custom packages. There is another tool part of Archlinux that let you build custom packages. These custom packages can be installed on your system, which is then seen like a normal package and handled this way with all the defined dependencies and information about the package. You can install the package from a local location, it does not need to be online repository.

        Then you can upload it to the AUR, which is exactly that: Arch User Repository. But you don’t have to upload it. Either way such a custom build package is what I referred to my own AUR package. For more information see: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository

    • Mwas alt (prob)@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      The focus on terminal stuff without too much bloat by default is also a huge plus.

      Prob the reason why i hated garauda (Idk if is it because i picked the dragonized gaming ver)

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Probably. I’m definitely not a fan of Garuda Linux (never used it to be honest). The styling and the bloat are not my taste. But the most important thing to me is, if I can trust those developers and maintainers? And I don’t trust most non common distros. Looking at their webpage, they also have a KDE lite version with less bloat and bare minimum packages to get started. This is actually awesome!