renzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 29 days agoThanks for the warning I guess??lemmy.worldimagemessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1742arrow-down133
arrow-up1709arrow-down1imageThanks for the warning I guess??lemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 29 days agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-squarePacattack57@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·29 days agoIt’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-229 days agoShouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then? Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it. If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way. I just don’t get it, logically.
minus-squareHalosheep@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·28 days ago“Nobody has said anything” sounds a bit better than “everyone has said nothing”, which is about how it should be interpreted.
It’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
Shouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then?
Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it.
If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way.
I just don’t get it, logically.
“Nobody has said anything” sounds a bit better than “everyone has said nothing”, which is about how it should be interpreted.