NONE@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 个月前"The Most open Operating System"lemmy.worldimagemessage-square187fedilinkarrow-up1998arrow-down110file-text
arrow-up1988arrow-down1image"The Most open Operating System"lemmy.worldNONE@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 个月前message-square187fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 个月前By what definition would it be more open to advertisers and data brokers?
minus-squareitslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 个月前By showing ads and selling your data
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 个月前I meant how that action would make it open for them? Also, if those actions make it open, would it be open to everyone (if they have money)
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·30 天前 if they have money They’d be welcome how that action would make it open for them? Like with open source you can browse the source, but this time it’s ad-makers browsing your computer
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·30 天前I was asking which definition (open having multiple) would apply in the context of the windows OS being open to advertisers
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·29 天前I think, ‘ready to be read or used’, and ‘not limited’ fits best
Advertisers and data brokers
By what definition would it be more open to advertisers and data brokers?
By showing ads and selling your data
I meant how that action would make it open for them?
Also, if those actions make it open, would it be open to everyone (if they have money)
They’d be welcome
Like with open source you can browse the source, but this time it’s ad-makers browsing your computer
I was asking which definition (open having multiple) would apply in the context of the windows OS being open to advertisers
I think, ‘ready to be read or used’, and ‘not limited’ fits best