• Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m gonna take a wild guess and say it won’t apply to him.

      Or if it does then he’ll just delete accounts he wants to block.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow…

    Is there some kind of tech CEO competition running or something?

    “Who can alienate their user base the fastest”

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a saying, " never attribute to malice what is easily explained by incompetence".

      But we’re quickly reaching the point where it’s no longer easily explained incompetence. Elon is either the most incompetent person in the known universe, which is saying a lot, or he’s doing this on purpose for some reason.

      I’m not into conspiracies, but it’s starting to make more sense if he’s actively trying to tank the stock.

      • Fauxreigner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s no stock to tank. You could argue that he’s trying to tank the company, but there are easier ways to do that.

        • BobKerman3999@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes there are, but he’s already with the SEC breathing on his neck for other scams so I guess he wants plausible deniability.

          • Fauxreigner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s no stock or similar security, so the SEC doesn’t care at all. Could be a plausible deniability thing, I just think it’s more likely that he really is that dumb, given the stories about Tesla/SpaceX having teams that basically existed just to control him.

        • baleygr@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You could argue that he’s trying to tank the company

          I’m kinda lost here. What’s his end goal with it?

          • 🇺🇦 seirim @lemmy.pro
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Depriving the libs of a favored platform via making it conservative and unruly, and weakening its democratic potential against authoritarian states like Saudi Arabia, is the theory.

      • generalpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean, 2024 isn’t that far away. It’s pretty clear who he’s pandering to in the name of “free speech” or “townsquare of the internet” or whatever shitty rationalization he uses to explains his nutty behavior.

      • norealme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Once upon a time, long ago, in the very beginning, I liked Twitter as a stream of instant information from all POV. Then Twitter became a haven for bots and a propaganda tool. Is it possible that Musk bought Twitter so that he could take it to the point of absurdity and destroy it?

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I quit Twitter after the infantile incident with Elon Musk carrying a sink around his own office. From all that we’ve seen in recent years it’s pretty clear he’s lucky to have been born rich, because he definitely isn’t the visionary we thought he was.

    • CannaVet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I made my first ever Twitter account a month or two before Musk bought it, for purely NSFW reasons. I’d log in every couple weeks or whatever, handle my business, and move along. After he bought it, I said whatever I’m not doing anything useful data wise so I’ll continue my few times a month visits.

      First post-Musk visit, it’s fine. Business handled, close my incog window, move on.

      Second post-Musk visit, I log in, and it’s CP as far as the eye can see. I immediately deleted my account.

      • Marxine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Holy hell, on a serious country the government would go scorched earth on Twitter’s servers and sue tf outta Musk

      • nutel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Day 1 lol. Lemmy have been in development for more than 3 years. It’s just now that reddit got to suck even more lemmy and other alternatives got their opportunity.

  • A.R.S@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ayyyy Elon, so we’re going for full chaos??

    Lemme grab my popcorn before the change starts a nuclear reaction.

    Surely a sight to behold. Lol

  • DJDarren@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elon Musk is a gaping, farting anus. I pay as much attention to the sounds from a gaping, farting anus, as I do from him.

      • Trizza Tethis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, maybe? 4channers do some pretty crazy shit when they’re raiding, at least from what I’ve seen. Remember when they raided Microsoft Tay’s Twitter and turned it into a white supremacist?

    • petrescatraian@libranet.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @Hypersapien This could make his decision a wonderful backfire

      Imagine posting something like:

      You can’t block this post, can you? You could if you’d joined [mastodon instance]. [then continue with a few words about mastodon and the instance in question and how to sign up - either as a thread or as a picture slideshow]

      Edit: same can be done with Calckey for example, but with no need to promote a special server, since Calckey doesn’t force you to sign to it’s main server through any of the apps iirc

      @dirtmayor

      • lohrun@fediverse.boo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think we need something like that for twitter and for Reddit. Having something quick and concise with some links where to go is bound to get more bound headed our way

        • petrescatraian@libranet.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          @lohrun sadly I don’t think spez is that stupid to fuck every little thing up from a social network, all at once almost. Sure, I think you can buy some ad space on Reddit, but imo there’s nothing too evident for this to be easy peasy.

          Not to mention, Mastodon was already larger than Lemmy when the crisis point happened (the other two contenders, kbin - which is still in beta - and Lotide, are even smaller!). Maybe convincing the sub admins to try to be admins of communities and see how it goes? (Except that there are multiple communities here on the same topic, but on different instances - again, not sure how this is gonna work out)

          @dirtmayor @Hypersapien

  • NoxiousPluK@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fun fact: a block feature is required to be accepted by the Apple AppStore review process. So Twitter will disappear from Apple devices with this change.

    Since this got some votes and became visible, here’s the source:

    Apps with user-generated content present particular challenges, ranging from intellectual property infringement to anonymous bullying. To prevent abuse, apps with user-generated content or social networking services must include:

    - A method for filtering objectionable material from being posted to the app

    - A mechanism to report offensive content and timely responses to concerns

    - The ability to block abusive users from the service

    - Published contact information so users can easily reach you

    https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#user-generated-content

    • StrayCatFrump@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hmm. Hate to be a downer, but that sounds like there needs to be a way for the service itself to block (ban) users and material, not for users to be able to block other users. So I wouldn’t be too optimistic about Apple’s response…

    • Tekhne@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple’s review process is inconsistent at best. I used to work for an iOS app and it took several years before they blocked our release for not having a report feature on products. Never had the ability to block users, despite the ability to DM people.

      Plus, for an app the size of Twitter, Apple will likely ignore most rules that doesn’t lose them money.

  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    it’s unavoidable to center Elon here but can we just take a step back and appreciate how stupid, bad, and completely antithetical to a usable website this idea is? blocking has been a feature on like everything since phpBB forums because it literally just works. it’s an easy way to curate your experience without escalating and it’s a logical imitation of being able to simply avoid a person in real life. the idea of removing this in favor of nothing but mutes is just goofy as fuck (and if you make muting the new “block”, what’s even the difference between them? people will just use them basically the same way!).

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Muting means other people can still comment on your stuff, and everyone else but you can see it.

      Its so transphobes and homophobes can continue commenting on LGBT people’s content.

      • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Elon Musk really fucking hates his trans daughter. Dad of the century, right here.

        Seriously good on his daughter for dropping his scumbag ass. She deserves far better from a parent.

          • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            He ascribes to Longtermism and like his associate Jeffery Epstein, he thinks his genes are magically special, and so he wants as many offspring as humanly possible: while not actually giving one shit about the quality of life for any of them.

            It’s really interesting, because he fucking hates his own father (Errol is also a creep who fathered a child with his step-daughter, who he raised from childhood), but can’t put together that he is exactly the fuck the same as his creep ass father.

      • DarraignTheSane@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lemmy’s “block” is essentially a “mute” function, too. It makes it so that you don’t see any more content from a user, but they can still make comments on your stuff.

  • Gerula@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another great ideea from greatest Genius of our age! Of God how could we live without him until now! /s

    • catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s insane how ludicrous his ideas in particular seem to be, especially with Twitter. This has to be trolling, surely? Or does he not want to allow people to block him?

      • BobKerman3999@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s mask off now and he wants his very own version of free speech in your face. That means him and his nazi friends will abuse you to no end and if you reply he’ll ban you like the thin skinned bitch he is.

      • FlamingHot@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you have your personal “ban from plattform entirely” button, why would you need a block button? Jeez you guys it’s so obvious.

      • itty53@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s already overridden people blocking him. You still see his posts.

        He’s just trying to make sure it stays useful as a weapon for fascists like himself is all.

    • hglman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conservative money thinks that they can keep there opposition off balance by smashing social networks . Musk did not launch desatitis campaign out of nowhere.

    • vinniep@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Money. Tech was hot and trendy, so VCs were willing to continue pouring cash into a bottomless pit of unprofitable tech platforms, and now they’re not so everyone has to figure out how to make money off of the community. In a surprise to absolutely no one that’s been paying attention, companies filled with people that have never had to be profitable before are really bad at turning their company profitable and instead only manage to light large sections of it on fire. 🤷

    • Sploosh the Water@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      At the top levels, they are rich and well-connected enough that they don’t have to worry about failing like regular people.

      They can burn millions, billions of dollars and still get out with a fat paycheck, a pat on the back, and another CEO/exec job lined up by one of their many wealthy friends. Either that, or they are “forced” into retirement where they live large for their remaining lives.

      I wish somebody would force me into a wealthy retirement…