You’d think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it’s key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I’d never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The nuke is a bad example of the sheer power of the modern American military. It’s also a bit outdated. That legal mechanism was drafted when many other modern weapons and tactics were not even dreamed of. Just a couple days ago the US military announced its strongest armor yet.

        But I agree: your assault rifle may save you from others with an assault rifle, but it won’t do shit if the military comes for you.

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s a non sequitur though, unless you’re suggesting a tyrant would nuke the population he wanted to rule.