Mickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoSeems like solid advicelemmy.worldimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1633arrow-down172
arrow-up1561arrow-down1imageSeems like solid advicelemmy.worldMickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareAcinonyx@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down23·2 days agoif males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality
minus-squareMothmanDelorian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·49 minutes agoSo your solution to ending sexism is more sexism?
minus-squaretjsauce@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 days agoBy disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up. The words you use are good, but the context is bad.
if males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality
So your solution to ending sexism is more sexism?
By disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up.
The words you use are good, but the context is bad.