Lidl recalls Paw Patrol snacks after website on packaging displayed porn | TechCrunch
techcrunch.com
Superstore giant Lidl recalled Paw Patrol snacks after a website listed on the packaging displayed explicit content unsuitable for children.

Lidl recalls Paw Patrol snacks after website on packaging displayed porn::Superstore giant Lidl recalled Paw Patrol snacks after a website listed on the packaging displayed explicit content unsuitable for children.

  • aggelalex@lemmy.worldEnglish
    61·
    1 year ago

    All that food wasted for something that could be fixed within the confines of the internet.

      • ThenThreeMore@startrek.websiteEnglish
        8·
        1 year ago

        Lidl returns it’s food to the distribution centres to be turned into energy. It’s wasteful but it’s not just in the dumpster out back.

      • StudioLE@programming.devEnglish
        81·
        1 year ago

        How many people are actually returning this product though? Nobody is going to any effort to return a product that costs so little.

        And everything I’ve read about this recall makes the reason clear so I can’t see anyone opting not to just consume it - which more than likely they already did immediately on purchase.

        • neckmeister@lemmy.worldEnglish
          9·
          1 year ago

          We have 3 packets left in the house. I’m not taking them back.

          It’s not like it’s a QR code that someone could scan by accident, and my son doesn’t exactly care what the small print says on his food’s packaging.

        • Ech@lemm.eeEnglish
          4·
          1 year ago

          The product they’re throwing out isn’t stuff that’s been returned, it’s every affected product they have in stock, which could be loads. Not even donated. Just tossed out.

    • madsen@lemmy.worldEnglish
      81·
      1 year ago

      I agree, however, the domain had apparently expired (according to the article), which makes it a great deal harder to fix reasonably fast. I still think issuing a statement that they’d lost control of the domain would suffice, but no, apparently wasting food is better for the bottom line.