Linuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agoRule, nail in coffinlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up192arrow-down10
arrow-up192arrow-down1imageRule, nail in coffinlemmy.blahaj.zoneLinuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-squareRubberDucky@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoAlso could be that they are scaling down systems
minus-squarechowder@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoIm just saying, he hasn’t been paying bills and it’s the first of the month.
minus-squareanimelivesmatter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIt’s almost as though the mass exodus he bragged about causing has consequences
minus-squareLinuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYeah something I thought since he was “forced” to buy twitter, was he would just burn it to the ground. What does he care?
minus-squarecatastrophicblues@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoWhy would that affect these metrics?
minus-squareThurstylark@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoLess servers able to serve requests means either get overloaded and have downtime, or rate limit and stay up. Both are bad, but rate limiting is less bad.
Also could be that they are scaling down systems
Im just saying, he hasn’t been paying bills and it’s the first of the month.
It’s almost as though the mass exodus he bragged about causing has consequences
Yeah something I thought since he was “forced” to buy twitter, was he would just burn it to the ground. What does he care?
Why would that affect these metrics?
Less servers able to serve requests means either get overloaded and have downtime, or rate limit and stay up.
Both are bad, but rate limiting is less bad.