That’s fair, but my point still stands.
That’s fair, but my point still stands.
IMO this has been very publicized in certain circles, and will have the effect of martyrdom. More people are going to be interested in doing this.
Honestly, if anyone has become a master in C, they can become a rust master in short order. It’s different, but not THAT different. The roots are the same.
Although the chances of me buying a Ford are extremely small, the odds of me getting a car with ads are 0%
I don’t believe this for a second. You can literally just look at it and intuitively understand. Not to mention part of the standard elementary school curriculum is how to read a clock.
I’m disappointed with how many people are falling for this
What?? No way!! :O
This used to be true, and there was enormous investment in nuclear power.
But the truth is that renewables have come a LONG way these past few decades. In many places, renewables is the cheapest energy to invest in, cheaper than even Fossil fuels in many cases. And much much cheaper than nuclear.
Why build a nuclear plant when you can build diversified renewable energy sources for the same price or less?
As a very small added bonus, renewables can’t be turned into bombs. Yet.
What do you like about thunderbird?
Maybe not 1998 but it definitely has a particular look. I like it though, it’s utilitarian.
The issue, besides making minimum wage workers lives hell, is that the carts offten end up in the street, and can become a hazard or hit people’s cars. If it doesn’t have a corral, then take it to the store. Otherwise take it to the corral.
Ah, I have only used both a relatively small amount, and from my experience I think thunderbird is more functional, flawed though my perspective may be. In what ways has outlook been more functional, from your perspective?
I do not understand why anyone would use Outlook when thunderbird is free and, in my experience, much more functional.
It actually took me a long time to realize I like vinegar. I’ve always liked sour food and pickles especially, but I never made the connection until a few years ago.
Honestly, most mid range phones are not built to last. When I spend hundreds of dollars on a phone, it needs to last for years and years.
In the US there is enormous investment in new NAND and other chips manufacturing. The government does not want these products and materials to be expensive or scarce. So the good news is the US gov will likely jump on this immediately.
Honestly there are a lot of variables involved. There will always be a market for cars without all that nonsense, and it’s cheaper to produce a car without a touch screen. If I have to drive shitmobiles to avoid having to deal with “car as a service”, then that’s what I will do.