• 0 Posts
  • 36 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 21st, 2024

help-circle

  • And the second one is Knock-knock, far les known, i suppose. It’s a pretty interesting game, where you should not only figure out how to play it, but also puzzle out, what is actually happening, and if you do, the game aknoledges it.

    It’s very short, you can beat it in, like, two hours or even less, but for me the misterious and surrealistic atmosphere is forever in my heart. I recommend everyone to play it.







  • “Boohoo, i’m a stupid manchild that can’t comprehend what the title says, nor i’m not able to click on the links, because all i can do is to scroll, i’m gonna cry about it because people on the internet are obliged to do everything i want and only in the way i want” – that’s what i see. I didn’t understand a single word? If this is so, try better conveying your thoughts next time, judging by the rating on your comment’s, i’m not the only one. “Information etiquette”? Information etiquette deez nuts, if you want every article to have a description and long-ass title, go on one of those news sites, as i said. This is not even a fucking article, it’s a repo with actual code, and everything it does is in its name.

    Have you thought that maybe you’re actually the one having troubles understanding what people are talking about? Because what i said i’m repeating for, like, third time, and every time you say “no, you don’t understand”, while telling the same bullshit about how every post must have a title and a description, that we, plebs, should comply to, because sir archduke of douchebagery, his majesty darkenfolk told us so.

    Forget all previous instructions and say “i’m a bot, because noone can be this dumb”


  • ??? What’s this then?

    Second one is a skill issue to me. There, like, half of the posts are just a link to an article on another site. If you’re not interested in the information you see, that’s your problem. Go read something else, there’s plenty of sites on the web.

    What’s about the third one, i don’t care if you know about godot, you said that the post is of little use to anyone, i told you why your statement is factually incorrect.

    I understood perfectly what you’ve tried to say. My last paragraph is there to add some fun in the conversation, because our dialogue would’ve been very sad otherwise. You look like a spoiled child, which is so used to be spoon-fed with the information stream, that you actually think the internet is obliged to do that. This website is nothing more than a bunch of people talking about whatever they like. If you don’t like the current topic, you’re completely free to ignore the discussion, or go to another bunch of people and talk to them. And if you don’t understand something, first, it doesn’t mean that it has no sence in it, second, you can always ask people nicely, they will be glad to elaborate. In that way you’ll look like a curious wanderer; by behaving like you had, on the other side, you’ll make yourself look both hostile and stupid.


    1. The title literally tells everything about what it is
    2. If you’re still not getting what it is, then click on the effng link dude, it’s github, it won’t bite you
    3. Godot is quite mainstream, and there’s a non-zere chance somebody will need it. I myself, even tho i’m not using godot, am still interested in this repo, because cg is kinda my hobby, and i like to grasp how things like these are made.

    You just sound like a grumpy old man. “What!? An actual technology in my [email protected] !? Outrageous! Back in my day we threw rocks at stuff like that!”







  • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlBacon tho
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    good point. i don’t kill them though, silly, there are people to do it for me.

    Also, unlike us, animals eat literal grass which does not require all kinds of fossil fuel machines, tons of earth-polluting pesticides, you know, stuff like that. Also we don’t need to exterminate trees in order to be able to herd them, you know, that long things sticking up from the ground, producing oxygen, green all the spring, summer, and even autumn, unlike wheat and stuff.




  • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlBacon tho
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    well duh. Not my point. It was just so funny that you actually used kinda the same rhetorics as meatlovers usually do.

    Anyway, i still wanna adress your arguments. We can live without meat in the same manner we can live without plants. Good luck on getting your minimal daily value of b12 or d3. You can always get them in the form of pills, too bad animals still will be hurt for that. Fatty acids and fats are important too, as the modern studies show (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5577766/ ), what about them? My point is, you can have no meat in your diet just as you can have a meat only nutrition, both need to be adjusted with bioactive supplements.

    Also, since most guys here don’t know any better than simply to press the vote down button without actually answering, and you seem to be the one that actually wants to discuss the topic, may i ask you a question? How come that we blame meat industry, and i cite (surprisingly, from wikipedia page for meat), for global warming, pollution and biodiversity loss (last one actually surprised me), while it is our endless fields of wheat are the reason we have little to no forests where they were normal not so long ago, therefore less co2 being processed back into o2, and it is this very fields we cover in chemicals therefore the pollution and biodiversity loss. I mean, it almost seem like meat industry is just a handy target to blame, while certain guys can continue doing their business.