Is that the same thing we Americans refer to as an “English Muffin”? I always thought crumpets were cookies or something lol.

Until you can use things like banking apps on them they will never be mainstream sadly.

I mean, you said that camera thing like it was some kind of mic drop lol. I’m also not sure what you mean by “my logic”, since I don’t personally have much of an opinion on the law it’s self, I was just curious why someone would be so vehemently against it. I’m not the original commenter that started this chain.

If it’s a matter of wasted resources, I guess I see your point, but it’s a bit of a reach. I don’t know if it’s as big of a waste as you’re claiming when we have corporations trying to implant customers with brain chips like neuralink, I mean who knows where that technology could go if it ever gets off the ground. Personally I think the Justice system attempting to have a bit of foresight is a good thing.

Is there a downside to having a law like this on the books?

Also, isn’t banning cameras like a mind-blowingly bad idea? That would mean people couldn’t do things like record police committing crimes, hell you wouldn’t even be able to install a dash cam on your car.

this was a thing before ICP even existed.

If you’re already willing to put up with all the other bullshit Apple does, I don’t see why you’d care about them doing this.

This comment has similar vibes to a boomer in the 80s saying that the Internet is useless and full of nothing but nerds arguing on forums, and he doesn’t see that changing.

How

Someone linked the fact check article higher up the comment chain.

If it were enforceable I would, but “no exclusivity” is a pipe dream.

Were you born a cunt this massive or did you have to work at it?