• 0 Posts
  • 68 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 10th, 2024

help-circle










  • You piss others off by being condescending and generalize your answer over the specifics of the post (Google) and then act surprised when someone pisses back?

    Okay then I educate you:

    Base Load = 70% Industrial Needs 24/7

    Base Load = Paid by everyone

    Base Load = Reliable Power

    Again… you don’t need nuclear to run hospitals and street lights.

    I never even said “nuclear bad” only: If nuclear, attach the correct price point to it… including waste disposal. Suddenly huge investments on buffering reliable regenerative energy becomes an option… because nuclear is only cheap when everyone carries the cost, because the Industry needs (base load level safety) power.

    And for the article: Where steel mills produce jobs, LLM training is killing them. So we all will have to pay for the disposal of nuclear waste produced by a startup nuclear reactors without any participation on the profits. It’s not even about Base Load, because Google tries to minimize the strain on “Base Load” by integration of the reactors into the data centers. Still… waste is an issue as with bigger nuclear too. And they won’t pay for the disposal.

    And you are repeating yourself like: “Base Load” " Educate yourself" without even being able to explain anything… except: Base Load is “Night energy”… WTF? BRO?

    Are you even trying? Or is this just another shill/troll post from some “nuclear to the moon” bullshit from Wallstreet bets?




  • I don’t berate. He is right, but again I don’t see how the containment of nuclear waste, Google is producing for LLM training for their profits, should be a public concern. Even on a global scale, “base load” is the continuous need of power … so mostly industries. You don’t need Nuclear Power Plants to run street lights and Hospitals, you need them to run steel mills and manufacturing plants.

    My point is exactly: Why should the industrial need for reliable power be priced on our bill without a fair share on the profits for society? And this isn’t even touching the impossibility of putting a price tag on something that has to be stored for 1000ns of years.

    Unhinged? I just replied in the same tone. He didn’t even reply to any of my points. Come clear, what’s your point?


  • Base load? Oh you mean the kind of power only the industry needs but wouldn’t be able to pay for if it wouldn’t be shifted towards the public? Don’t try to fool people by just not talking about this little fact.

    Solar and small scale power buffering could easily be decentralized for the publics overall power need, including charging and utilizing cars as buffers. A private person isn’t “the base load”… but we all pay for “the base load”.

    Base load err… educate yourself nuclear boy.

    Apart from that: Your arguments didn’t change, they are still wrong, that’s why “we” stopped listening. You reproduce Industry talking points without checking. (e.g. “bAsE loAD”) like an angry little LLM.

    Who needs the power needs to pay for it. Including the waste. I don’t see why I should clean up Google’s micro nuclear waste.