Have you tried emailing the authors? It’s well known that some folks will gladly respond with a copy of the paper at no charge.
Have you tried emailing the authors? It’s well known that some folks will gladly respond with a copy of the paper at no charge.
Removed by mod
I always thought the cyberpunk genre was a warning, not a blueprint.
He was a guest on her podcast when he said this, so no, it’s not stupid news.
Even further, ChatGPT isn’t an AI, and AI doesn’t exist.
That’s basically the premise of the movie.
From the article that was posted:
The main new feature is support for I2P, the Invisble Internet Project. It uses a fully encrypted privacy network layer to hide user activity and locations. The network does not use servers. Peers contributed “a portion of their resources” to other network particpants.
The maintainers promise that “non one can see where traffic is coming from, where it is going, or what the contents are” when the Invisible Internet Project is active.
universal healthcare won’t solve the issue, unless we can get costs under control.
But universal healthcare would get prices under control. You’re thinking completely backwards.
universal healthcare won’t solve the issue, unless we can get costs under control.
But universal healthcare would get prices under control. You’re thinking completely backwards.
And to think, I just got downvoted to fuck the other day because someone claimed wasn’t available in the UK. lol
Thank you for clearing that up.
If you’re in the States, maybe take a peek at Firefox Relay.
Oooooooo, is this the start of a RATM parody?
Yes, it is.
Edit: downvoted because I was able to sign up for a service recently?
Have you tried Firefox Relay? They have a paid tier that gives you a phone number and unlimited email masks. Yes, you have to provide a number, and yes you have to pay, but you wouldn’t be giving Meta or Discord your contact info.
This means that children would never learn - at least not on their own, via social media - of these atrocities committed by Hamas. That would appear like a net positive for the Palestinian side.
That’s where your confusion is. This isn’t to hide what’s happening to make Hamas look good. This is about removing violent content. What the parent commenter and I are saying is that there’s no mention of the violence the IDF are perpetrating, as if it isn’t happening.
I’ve now reached a point where I’ve said it as plainly as possible. If you’re still not able to comprehend what’s being said after this, I don’t know what else to tell you.
I’m not sure how many times I can say it. The point is the singling out of one, and staying silent about the other. It’s about the hypocrisy. I’m not sure why this is so difficult, friend.
Welp, I totally misunderstood the question then. Sorry.