I’m not sure what’s worse. the fact you can understand the incoherence or that you believed any of it.

personally I think it’s the phone that’s more the problem. the persistent access seems like it contributes more to habit forming than the nebulous definition of social media. and that’s much easier to define and possible enforce.

found the smoker

found the scourge

I will never not cringe at “on accident” instead of “by accident”

euchhhh.

same as my GameStop shares

easier than typing out a long string

yeah, some title gore going on here.

really? you’re supposed to know it’s not Minnesota. SUCH AS AMERICANS.

but I guess you grokked the comment like an average American so there’s that.

welcome, but maybe consider not using the world instance. it is pretty saturated and the point is to spread users out across many instances instead of having one monolithic one

thanks. perfect.

that’s THE joke. what other possible interpretation is there?

I’m definitely struggling to understand how this happened. it sticks out like a sore thumb.

I, too understand the joke.

there’s a time and place for it. if it’s a conversation about detailed opinions then no. but when someone basically asks for a simple definition then yes.

I’ll allow it when it’s warranted. this one just reeks of haste and overall reduces the quality of the impact. I felt like I was tripping on roots trying to read it.

*what it was like moving a TV from one room to another in the 90s.

I know I’m being that guy, but meme grammar is often pretty abysmal.

title-and-post-gore!

one of the many amazing details!