- Are you AI/bot?
- Wall of text = incomprehensible, would not read/5.
- It’s rarely about how good the devices are, but how much they cost + Apple’s two-faced moral model that makes people oppose/reject it.
There are no relevant studies concerning the topic. What might seem like a widespread trend, might as well be merely a local peculiarity.
Oh, I wouldn’t ever suggest that the method does everything its author says it does - the claims of helping in cancer cases and such are wee bit too “optimistic”.
But the question was concerning the possibility to build up cold immunity. And the answer is “yes”. The method I mentioned absolutely will build up cold’s immunity (or resistance, or tolerance if language purism is a factor) in everyone who will attempt it.
There’s no magic hocus-pocus in it. It’s very simple concept used in many “methods” - Buteyko comes to mind, so does Russian Siberia.
Do you think it is overpriced?
Given its capabilities and the fact that you can buy used MS notebook/360 device for such a price? Of course.
$498
optional keyboard cover for an extra $101.
Ah, I understand. It’s an attempt to replicate Steve “unwashed” Jobs’ strategy, where buying overpriced stuff makes you BETTER, DIFFERENT and UNIQUE. Am I right?
Truth is dramatic.
Threat to Public Safety
Dude, you forgot which of two worlds is the real one. Hint: it’s not the Internet.
updating hard disc firmware
😆
using WinRAR
And that’s how I know that voting should be a privilege, not a right.
I have no idea whom I’m talking to in the 'Net.
Neither have you. Nor anybody else…
Can you give me an example?
Of course, but bear in mind it’s going to be a crude, primitive example.
Imagine me talking to - unknown fact to me - a pedophile over the Internet. For reasons unknown I made him angry. Angry enough to stalk me, invade the privacy of my home and steal my child, just to make me suffer because he felt I did him wrong.
My anonymity protects me against such an occurrence.
Advertisement. Malware. Scams. Abuse of trust. Current and future exploits that I have no knowledge, or understanding of.
No. I don’t enjoy being anonymous, but the problem lies in bodies, organizations, and people abusing the non-anonymity.
It’s like
Do you understand the difference?
Because we do not enjoy the invasion on our privacy.
Hmmmmm, there’s definitely a merit in the idea, but I was more about dopamine excretion itself - from what I gather, the actual content should be playing the most important role in it, to the point that a, hmmmm, highly evocative scene would influence the brain no matter if seen in vivd colors or greyscale.
I need to do some research on the topic, to make up my mind. 😉
Interesting.
Gonna give it a read later.
Thank you. 👍
Can’t comment on the article’s content if it’s unavailable to read…
And judging from what little they decided to show, it’s not exactly an article relevant to what you’re saying here?
Could you provide a few links from some considerably respectable sources?