Co-op is generally considered more correct, yes
Co-op is generally considered more correct, yes
Good day for the Satisfactory 1.0 release then
This is basically correct, though it also does other stuff.
EDIT: Location services is in its own process tho
I didn’t see anything in the ruling that would restrict it in that way, but i would be happy to be wrong there.
It’s not useless, it’s saying you can’t afford the better quality product you dirty, dirty poor.
I unironically think it would be easier to train users that the report button works now than it would to get automated reporting that was worth a damn implemented.
This. I found the squirrels to leave the bird feeders and the garden alone if you leave them a danegeld of raw peanuts and maybe strap an ear of corn to the tree.
Agreed, but I don’t think anyone here is arguing against split bill for generation vs grid maintenance and improvement, just that they want return on the power they put back into the grid, if for no other reason than to offset their own investment
Sure, but it’s ‘free’ generation capacity, and storage works far better at grid scale
This post is forgetting the alcohol
My solution to this was to put the default download folder on an nvme and then move the torrent to a storage hdd after completion
I’m not sure. I never ran into an issue with the boot partition last time I did this, but that was vmware fusion on a macos host in like… 2015 so. So while I would probably just yolo it and unmount the boot partition (or maybe try to migrate/reinstall to another drive so it can have its own boot partition?), you might be better off trying something else.
Either that or try another hypervisor
I’m disappointed that this wasn’t real.
I should see someone about making a sign.
This is one area where Win11 (and maybe an updated win10?) might have a leg up: my hyper V has the option of adding a disk later in the wizard, which allows me to go into IDE controller 0 and mount a physical disk in the new vm’s settings:
As a networking nerd, I am endlessly frustrated with how many otherwise smart people are just ‘fuck ipv6 lmao’
Giving me goddamn flashbacks to this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v26BAlfWBm8
Google doesn’t care about eyeballs, just watch time, ad dollars, and click through rates.
Happily, the costs (server/hypervisor, domain, static IPs, proper firewall) are ones I already needed to spend for work, so the only tricky part will be finding the time and making the effort. Maybe by then the ux issues with low population instances will be sorted lmao.
Used fedia today, and it looks like they never quite nailed down their 504 problem, so I think I’ll give this one a go for a while.
I went to donate to Mozilla when I switched back to it from chrome early last year. It said on their website by the donate link, which was very difficult to find, that the proceeds from those donations did not go towards firefox but towards their other projects.
I don’t know if that’s the case today, but there was no way to contribute to firefox directly when I sought it out, or at least not in a way I could find. Maybe it was a stipulation of the Googlegeld, idk.
Step 1: Be hilariously wealthy from prior investments and businesses Step 2: Do a thing nobody has ever done before at a time when interest rates mean money is free Step 3: Blind luck
I’m not sure how they’re supposed to reproduce those at this point.