These are the uBlock rules used to block the headers from youtube channels. The ‘about’ tab is intentionally left unfiltered for the cases I actually want to see that information.
https://pastebin.com/raw/MEUPPs0Z
edit: had to put the code on pastebin since the code markdown doesn’t seem to work here.
Adblockers can do more than just block ads, they also allow you to customize websites. As a simple example you can remove the annoying headers on youtube channels that take half the screen:
It’s also great for news sites. I have a filter to remove articles on topics I don’t care about. I also have rules to prevent these sites from automatically reloading after certain amount of time, something that I find very annoying.
special sauce they cooked it with let’s it run on the trashheap of a computer
It’s called coding in VS C++ and using native Windows controls, a dying art form unfortunately. The price is losing cross-platform compatibility.
I’m curious. How do you train such AI without being raided by the authorities?
I suspect with a creative enough prompt you will likely be able to claim copyright and author ship over the works.
It seems that’s not the case, no matter how much effort or time you expend on the prompts. This is from the Copyright Office:
The Office does not question Ms. Kashtanova’s contention that she expended significant time and effort working with Midjourney. But that effort does not make her the “author” of Midjourney images under copyright law. Courts have rejected the argument that “sweat of the brow” can be a basis for copyright protection in otherwise unprotectable material.18 The Office “will not consider the amount of time, effort, or expense required to create the work” because they “have no bearing on whether a work possesses the minimum creative spark required by the Copyright Act and the Constitution.”
Here’s another key factor:
Because of the significant distance between what a user may direct Midjourney to create and the visual material Midjourney actually produces, Midjourney users lack sufficient control over generated images to be treated as the “master mind” behind them. The fact that Midjourney’s specific output cannot be predicted by users makes Midjourney different for copyright purposes than other tools used by artists.
This only applies to an image generated with AI prompts that isn’t significantly altered by an artist.
Autonomously AI generated art cannot be copyrighted.
If you generate something with AI and claim you created it yourself you can easily be asked to reproduce a similar works again.
Asked by whom exactly? The Copyright Office? Are they going to ask for prove from every artist that requests registration for a work?
If you say you did use AI you should be able to show how much effort you are putting into creating the images
Or you can lie in your request. From the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices:
“As a general rule, the U.S. Copyright Office accepts the facts stated in the registration materials, unless they are contradicted by information provided elsewhere in the registration materials or in the Office’s records.”
In practical terms? If you are going to generate content using AI either don’t say it was AI generated or lie about how much human involvement it had. Also you can’t use “this work was completely made by AI” as a hook.
That latter case likely wont be copyrightable
It is if you don’t say it’s AI generated or you lie about how much human input it required which would be impossible to prove false.
they generate from stealing the work of thousands of human artists.
Has this been litigated yet?
Only if you say it was written by an AI, that’s the lesson here.
because since some diffusion generation are deterministic
You are generalizing and using the word “some” at the same time.
If you get caught we’ve never met.
Guess it’s time for another FPS hit…
Is it August already? Man, time flies.
Yes, but if you then downvoted the post it would still show a score of 10 in B and C instead of 9. This is the first of the two advantages I described. Even worse, if the post received 2 downvotes from ten different instances it would still show a score of 10 or 8 instead of -10.
Remember when android phones fitted in hands?
Under his tweet a lot of “verified” (=right wing) accounts plauded this and asked to fight employers who fired employees for having written something homophobic
Any examples of that?
And those who want to review every single one manually can still do that.
But will they? This tool promotes blindly trusting another instance block list without due diligence from the admin.
I don’t see how this is any different from adding another e-mail account on gmail.