I sometimes use openstreetmap, and it has its strengths and weaknesses. The data is afaik usually collected by GPS trackers and uploaded, therefore usually less accurate than some of the commercial providers using LIDAR etc. to actually measure the roads. Also, streets are missing speed limit information etc. And I don’t think they invested as much effort in data density, making the data cost prohibitive to download maps of e.g. multiple countries.
On the other hand, OSM is
- free. As in freedom, free license, etc. You can take screenshots and use them without being too woried about the license.
- If you want to integrate it in your website to e.g. allow tracking of items etc., I don’t know if the API is rate-limited, but if you wanted, you could actually download the relevant map data and host everything yourself.
- Hiking trails are often more complete and helpful
Regarding Google, Apple and Bing maps:
AFAIK, Apple and Bing are using mainly TomTom, they don’t have their own map data (I think Apple started collecting their own via GPS from navigation apps etc.). I think the only significant companies actually owning gobal map data are Google, HERE Technologies and TomTom.
Currently kinda controversial, but currently it’s still Fedora, the xfce4 version.
I had Debian for some time before, but had my apt packages messed up a couple of times to the point I had to entirely re-install. In stable, I was missing sufficiently recent versions, in testing I had other problems.
With Fedora dnf I had less problems recovering, usually more recent versions.
Xfce4 is just more suitable for my needs than Gnome.