I don’t recommend doing your laundry with a fucking machine, but you do you.

But that would be worse?

The solution to women being treated unfairly is not to start treating men unfairly too. It’s to treat women fairly.

Couldn’t you tell? It’s clearly a furry cat.

My university’s websites are actually OK.

The worst part is by far the fragmentation, where it’s sometimes easier to use a search engine if you’re looking for something specific.

This is proof that trans people want to DESTROY western society and traditional family values

In 2012, the Landgericht Hamburg (Regional Court) partially upheld Sony’s claims.

That’s Germany’s most blatantly biased court for copyright infringement by the way. Any regional court can be chosen when suing for copyright infringement but it’s always Hamburg that handles these cases. Be careful when publishing pictures of your home on the internet - your wallpaper may be copyrighted and you may have to pay a few thousand euros.

Fruity•Bussi

If buying isn’t owning, piracy isn’t stealing!

Couldn’t there be an implementation thay leaves everyone satisfied?

Sort of like implementating a new optional tab for discovery and allowing users to choose whether their posts appear on it. The implementation should of course be fully honest without dark patterns, though due to the lack of profit incentive it shouldn’t be difficult to achieve a satisfying implementation.

I saw it as:

• Sitting on bed alone
• Lying in bed with partner
• Sitting on the cuck stool next to the bed

I don’t believe it, at least not anymore.

Google has had more than enough data to train AI models from reCAPTCHA for many years. In 2010 it displayed 100 million captchas per day. You simply do not need hundreds of billions of solved captchas in your data set.

I feel like its only purpose nowadays is stopping basic bots and annoying people who don’t let themselves be tracked as much as advertisers would like.

Two reasons:

• Sleep data can give some information on your health but isn’t regulated as strictly as health data. Health data == Money
• Companies want your time and attention. TV manufacturers want you to use your TV as much as possible, social media companies want you to use their platform as much as possible, video game developers want you to play their games as much as possible. Nintendo successfully gained people’s time when outside through Pokèmon Go already. Now they’re trying to expand to your time sleeping. There’s not much time left which isn’t utilized by companies somewhat. Maybe there will be a Pokèmon School/Work soon?

Well, TOTP prevents at least these attack vectors, even for tech-illiterate people:

• Unnoticed data base leaks being used to gain full access to people’s accounts
• Credential stuffing (using another service’s leaked credentials to gain access)

With TOTP there must be at least some contact between the “hacker” and the victim.

I think most people are just unaware of the risk that is involved. Healthcare information is some of the most sensitive data on a person and should be protected at all cost.

Some older people in particular have as much of a self-preservation instinct on the internet as toddlers in real life. If protecting them takes away a tiny bit of agency from them then so be it because they cannot be trusted with such decisions. I believe any reasonable person would use MFA because trading off a tiny bit of convenience for a significant amount of security is always worth it.

Mandatory MFA isn’t a bad thing though.

If an old lady doesn’t want to remember a password, should she be able to enter just her email/identifier without any verification?

Young people see news influencers on social media which are even less trustworthy than traditional news outlets.

It’s the “I did my own research” of news.

Label the remappable button STREAMING SERVICE or something, I don’t know.

But Chemie comes from Chemnitz (obviously) so it must be pronounced with K

Don’t know where China comes from, maybe from Chinese which is obviously pronounced with K.

It’s obviously pronounced Kicago, just like Chamäleon, Chemie and China :)

Suppose the man is blind then. He has the ability to jump but is unaware of the trolley hurliing towards the people on the track. While he has the ability to act his only “crime” is being unaware. Isn’t this equivalent to the original trolley problem?

[I]t may rather be supposed that he is the driver of a runaway tram, which he can only steer from one narrow track on to another; five men are working on one track and one man on the other.

In this case, all six men are unaware of the runaway trolley heading towards them, believing themselves to be safe. The one working on his own track has not made up his mind yet as to whether he would want himself to be sacrificed. You would impose your own will onto him, wouldn’t you?

I don’t have any solution for variations of the trolley problem that satisfy me. I would likely act based upon what I felt was right at the time without considering (all) the implications. Without the threat of running out of time however, I believe it’s much more difficult to decide how to act.