• Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    10 months ago

    You could act like my cat after buying her the coolest, most expensive toy: just ignore it.

    • slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Ok kinda off topic but you don’t need expensive toys. Just watch what your cat enjoys doing the most. For mine, it’s jumping (herself or the toy) and feathers.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        10 months ago

        pretty sure their cat mostly enjoys ignoring all the sacrificial gifts they bring them.

        It’s just a different way of enjoying the toy, that’s all.

      • bighatchester@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        I give me car plastic straps that holds bundles of news papers together. I deliver news papers so it’s a endless supply . Also a little beaver you can stuff with catnip I got for like $5 .

  • Salamander@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Yes, you are right. If a mod wants I can send them the username and they can ban them from the community. I can see it as an admin from my instance but I can’t take action.

      • Salamander@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        There is one account that has a single comment from 5 months ago that is downvoting most posts and comments. That one is very suspicious

        Other than that… No other accounts are as obvious. A few do have some reoccurrences but most of those votes do seem organic on first inspection.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          We’ll look really silly when it turns out they just have the highest standard in the world for what constitutes adding to a discussion.

        • slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Thanks for the feedback. I was just thinking that because most posts get several downvotes (at least 3) once they reach a certain popularity.

          • Salamander@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            10 months ago

            A botnet could have many unique accounts, and some could even appear like users. So I can’t rule it out. I also haven’t done a deeper dive into the accounts.

            But when a post gets popular I would expect it to get at least a few downvotes, regardless of what it is.

  • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wondered about that - I sort of assumed it was either a cat hater who’d accidentally subscribed “why do these things keep popping up in my feed?”, or someone with impossibly high standards for what a cat is “No, that’s just not quite cat enough. That’s a down vote from me”.

    A bot is probably a more likely explanation.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Prolly a dog person. Let’s start posting cats>dogs over there….

    (I jest. It’s not like fake internet points even really matter,)

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        here really doesn’t make sense. Unless it was like a dog photo or something. but also, it could just be a testing ground for a bot that’s going to get used for a… self-evident motive.

        Pretty sure the mods (and definitely admin) can see whose downvoting what.

        • slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          That testing ground really does make sense.

          Edit: Also, funnily enough my testing of the keyword bot seems to have stopped downvotes of comments in the thread (but not the post itself)

  • radix@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    I think there’s a way to look up the logs of who downvoted and then you can just block them. It won’t block them for everyone else, though.

    • ono@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think regular users have access to that info on lemmy. (Maybe you’re thinking of a kbin feature?)

      • radix@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        You’re right. Upon further investigation, I realize it’s only something that instance admins have access to.

    • slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The bots are trying real hard to bury this post. Guess I triggered the keyword. How does one look that log up? And does blocking a user really disable them from downvoting your post?

      • radix@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Upon further research, I’ve realized that the upvote/downvote logs are only available to instance admins. Also, other users have said blocking a user does not disable them from downvoting your posts, so my idea wouldn’t work anyway. Sorry :(

      • XTL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Or maybe this isn’t the kind of content (even well tagged meta) that lots of readers want to see or think is good in general.

        Of course, traditionally any whining about downvotes or other vote manipulation should be met with downvotes.