I assume there must be a reason why sign language is superior but I genuinely don’t know why.

  • Gabu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Only in 'murica (and the anglosphere) could people think that learning more languages could possibly be a bad thing…

    • Devi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m not American but it’s suggested that learning a sign language and a ‘spoken’ language at the same time can slow the acquisition of both.

      We see it in kids with two ‘spoken’ languages too but I believe to a lesser extent.

      If I had a deaf kid I would teach them both but I understand the choices of parents that don’t do that.

      • DeadPand@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        What in the world? It’s commonly understood that children learn the fastest and if you want to learn multiple languages, it’s best learned early…

        • Devi@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’ve got mixed up there. If you plan to learn multiple languages then it is beneficial to learn as a child but even similar languages, like English and French, can cause issues communicating when young. When learning vastly different languages especially when one is written and one signed it causes a lot of issues. This can leave a deaf child struggling to communicate for a time.

          Often deaf parents will choose to stick to sign first.