I’m getting sick every day at this Microsoft Windows slowness and bloat. I am trying to use as much Linux VMs as possible. I feel so unproductive on Windows. I also tried installing Linux on the office laptop. The problem is that Windows is officialy supported and the Linux is DYI. Once the IT departament changes it will sync up with Windows but Linux can be broken and you are no longer able to work. Next job I want to have full Linux laptop or at least Mac.

Besides:

  • Microsoft Office
  • Active Directory
  • Some proxy and VPN bullshit

Everything seems manageable and even better on Linux.

What is your experience?

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’d use Linux for homelab if there was native Fusion, since I need that for school.

  • The Doctor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    When I could get away with it at work, I did.

    In the last… I want to say six or seven years, issuing Macbooks to sysadmins has been a common thing in the sectors I work in. Rather than put up with us going rogue and messing up license tracking by rebuilding our stuff with a distro of choice, management just throws OSX at the problem (us, we’re the problem) because operationally it’s close enough for our purposes.

    It’s not my choice or preference, but the money’s green.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    I use office 360 in the browser.
    I’m not a typical sysadmin but I use linux anyway. Somehow I always found some workarounds, but I am also not the only one using Linux in our company so the IT needs to work with us to some degree.

  • Nine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    MacOS, nearly everyone who does anything with development or ops is using a MacBook. Though lately more “normal” employees have been getting MacBooks too.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      We have some client’s engineers who use MacBooks. I’ll just say that I’m wary of anyone technical using MacOS at this point.

      Though some of our devs use them too, but from what I’ve seen, they could just as well use Linux.

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Wary why? I work remotely in IT and manage a ton of Linux systems with it. Because my company has a large number of remote employees they limit us to Windows or Macs only, and have pretty robust MDM, security, etc. installed on them. Since MacOS is built on top of a unix kernel it’s much more intuitive to manage other unix & linux systems with it.

        Personally I haven’t used Windows really since before Windows 10 came out, and as the family tech support department I managed to switch my wife, parents, brother, and mother in-law all to Mac’s years ago as well.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’ve met some folks who’d use an Apple laptop as part of their general attempt to look more competent than they actually were, for managers and such. Or maybe just for their ego.

          If your choice is between Windows and MacOS - I dunno. Depends on how AuDHD-tolerant one can make MacOS. What I usually see doesn’t inspire confidence.

          • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            This is very anecdotal, but both myself and the vast majority of my peers use macOS as their base host system. I work in cybersecurity, specifically offensive penetration testing. Myself, most of my coworkers, and probably half of my peers I’m competing against at local conference CTFs or that I know at local meetups are using a MacBook host with VMs spun up to need.

            Something like 75% of my job is done in a Linux VM. Doing it on a MacBook is infinitely more pleasant than any other laptop I’ve ever tried using, regardless of what OS it’s running.

            Also, and again extremely anecdotal, the most technical people I’ve ever known were all using hackintoshes when I knew them, and would use MacBooks when away from the home/office.

            I really don’t understand where this “Mac products are for non-technical people who want to appear technical” trope comes from. MacOS is a phenomenal product for non-technical people. My partner is the least technical person in the world, but they started using macOS in art school and found it intuitive and easy to use. As a technical person, I appreciate the polished UI built on top of the Unix kernel and that I can do everything I need to do from a terminal shell. The fact that the product is excellent for both wildly disparate types of users is testament to how great it is imo.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              It’s different between countries, I suppose.

              Also people want different things. For me customizable desktops (say, FVWM however I want to script it) are important, because I easily get distracted and overloaded. I also can’t ignore aesthetics, and in my subjective taste Apple style is concentrated bad taste combined with arrogance. Also there’s something in their UI design making me feel nausea and get tired faster. I don’t know what it is.

              Other people want something else.

              It comes from subjective experience in a country where Apple is traditionally not very popular.

              I also can’t separate their disgusting advertising from their products, subjective again.

    • UNY0N@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      If this what works for work stuff, then more power to ya. I just hope you don’t do any personal stuff on there…

  • thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    MacOS. Systems doesn’t want to support Linux, and the only other option is windows 11. A few of my coworkers have Win11 with WSL and fight it every single day. They’re diehard windows people who have been seriously considering moving to MacOS for their next round of upgrades.

    • barkingspiders@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Also Mac here. I started with a linux laptop but still have to do some desktop support work for the company and since they all use Mac it’s just easier to dogfood it. At least I have a decent terminal emulator.

    • tyw0kki@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      Same here. I really really tried with WSL but the experience is miserable.

      Swapped to MacOS and like night and day. I’d be perfectly happy with a £300 linux laptop though.

      • Psyhackological@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, it is slow in the end, not native, many things to configure (like proxies) and so on…

        Great! Was it hard also to switch to MacOS as a Linux user for work?

        • Kualk@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I actually run away from Mac. Mac OS X is long time as not Linux.

          WSL is a way better option than whatever VM option is on Mac.

        • marlowe221@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, I do all my development in WSL2 (Ubuntu) at work every day. I use VSCode on the Windows 11 host. It’s great!

          Would I prefer to use Linux natively? Sure, but I also have to support some Windows-only legacy code and a D365 environment or two, so Windows makes sense.

          • Kualk@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            I am happy with WSL as well. I don’t try to get Linux GUI running.

            I use vscode remote ssh session. I run docker natively on Linux, not on windows.

            The trick is to get DBUS services running in whatever flavor of Linux you install. Don’t try running a full UI session.

            The biggest problem I have on Linux is time drift after laptop goes to sleep. it is easy to deal with manually.

            • poinck@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Do you have a guide that makes this possible?

              And what do you mean by using vscode remote ssh session? Does this vscode instance is started from the WSL via some kind of ssh- Y?

              • Kualk@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                Vscode is installed on windows. Then you install vscode ssh plugin from Microsoft and open ssh connection from vscode to any Linux including WSL hosted Linux.

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Windows 10 Enterprise with a ton of group polices applied, no issues ever. The Windows Terminal app is really good.

        • Psyhackological@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          For me it’s

          • apt
          • vim / neovim
          • tmux
          • BAAAAASH
          • and some other commands that I use seldom but from time to time.
            • Psyhackological@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Automation of the Cloud deployment.

              • OpenStack with Kolla Ansible
              • just Ansible
              • sometimes Bash scripting or Python

              Monitoring

              • Prometheus with Grafana and AlertManager

              Bare metal automation

              • Some BMC stuff
              • MAAS

              Fileserver maintance

              • MooseFS with Samba
              • Ceph OSDs cluster

              And any other that for now I don’t have much time like

              • AWX with Kubernetes
  • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Wdym with linux can be broken?

    Don’t mess woth the system and go atomic. Fedora atomic kde or gnome or wm

    • Psyhackological@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Changes from the upstream can make your system nonfunctional. For example VPN for remote connection. They change something, push to Windows but on Linux you need to figure it out by yourself.

      • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        On linux you just put the ovpn into the settings. VPN connections are built into the system

        Yes, I have used systems that broke. Yes I followed bad advice and broke my system. Ever since not touching my system, that didn’t happen again. If I would touch windows, I would brik windows as well.

          • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            With an atomic system it’s less likely to brick your system. You can stay in the debian world with vanillaos (I’ve never used it) but fedora atomic is very good. On a day to day basis you shouldn’t have/use admin rights to break your system

    • Kualk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Fedora atomic or not is nice.

      I got tired of manually installing Arch and was pleased with Fedora the most.

    • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Wdym with linux can be broken?

      Linux mint kept harassing me to install the official drivers for my wireless card, so I did. It broke my ability to use WiFi.

      I told Linux while in presentation mode I did not want the screen to sleep, it took that as sleep after 5 minutes.

      Every time the laptop sleeps/restarts my screen resolution is borked, half the time the correct resolutions are not available and I have to disconnect all my monitors, restart, then connect the monitors.

      Most solutions I hear are use a different distro, learn command line, you should not be using Linux if you cannot fix this stuff.

      That is what i mean when I say Linux can be broken.

        • Psyhackological@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yep, many people complain about Wayland and just graphic things in general. On Windows on the other hand sometimes I cannot click buttons. Example: unmute myself in Teams. Why? Because the docking station after some time cannot figure out where is the focus and also Electron sucks. And many other thing like weird behaviour with moving apps’ windows from one screen to another.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I would argue that they happen way more on Windows. I’ve never had any of that happen to me on Linux (mostly a Fedora user) but plenty of times on Windows from 7 to 11.

          • Psyhackological@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            The worst part is it is not Windows fault. The pure kernel and the system without any bloat works great. I tried AtlasOS once and I felt bad for Microsoft engineers that their work is being spoiled with greed, bloat, enshititifaction. Everything was going smoothly and flawlessly.

            But so many components are just… Hacky… Unnecessary… Just weird that it barely works especially so many companies don’t know what they are doing. Then the dependency hell happens of this software.

            Linux on the other hand is so much transparent.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        If you’re on Mint still, that’s X11 fucking you over. AFAIK, Mint hasn’t moved to Wayland, though you might be able to install an experimental session, but I wouldn’t trust it like a distro that’s all-in on Wayland.

        I used to contend with monitors jumping around like a jack russell terrier with X11, never keeping settings, dropping out due to ACPI. Wayland has fixed pretty much everything I had going wrong with that stuff.

        Boot a live USB of some distros that default to Wayland like Fedora, and see how it reacts to screensaving, then make some choices from there.

        • toastal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yet Wayland is still working on proper color management… which doesn’t make it fit for professional work

            • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              I like it a lot. The initial move was predicated by working in the entertainment industry and all the shows coming through our theater needed qlab.

              But after that I started using it for personal use. I was unable to move my photoshop cs6 license over because I have been unable to get a copy of it in 64bit. But I have since switched to affinity. It has a steep learning curve, but I mostly use it for graphics for my shop so it does what I need it to do.

              I have been using libre office since forever, that moved over with me.

              Before getting my MacBook Pro I was doing most of my gaming on my ps5, so I am not missing a lot there. But most of the games I do play are available on the Mac (No Man’s Sky, FF14, Palia, mudlet, Apico, Mudborne).

              When I connect a monitor it works, when I connect a TV through my 4x4 matrix it works.

  • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Most places seem to issue Mac’s now for the role. I just create a 90% cpu & memory Linux VM on them and work from within that, with the exception of teams or zoom meetings being native on the Mac (no echo cancellation on linux VM’s, it seems). Works mostly well, but it is arm64 based linux, as the Mac’s currently are M series.

    Ended up going with Arch for arm64, as it had the simplest way to add widevine support to my browsers.

    Much better than being native on the Mac… Mac doesn’t give me the two select&paste linux 2nd copy buffer, doesn’t provide focus follows mouse, no auto-raise, and type in partially covered windows without raise. Essential for my workflow.

  • Beko Pharm@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    What are your experience?

    My last “real” Windows experience was with WinXP and every time I have to touch Windows at the PC of a customer, which happens sometimes when the stars align, I feel like the first human that ever walked the earth.

    I have no idea how people get any work done on a system that is constantly nagging for attention, popups, restrictive Enterprise environment and non descriptive error messages. Nothing in this world seems to make sense or is presented in a unified way. Every dialogue or sub system seems to be it’s own isle stemming from another decade of tech. The experience for someone who is simply not used to Windows any more due to missing exposure is horrible.

    Heck a Mac feels alien to me too but in the end that’s still a system I could deal with given some time.

    Mebbe I’m spoiled by stuff like systemd, PipeWire, Wayland, btrfs and all that candy we get nowadays on a Linux desktop. I’m not even talking about privacy or FOSS principles at this point. Just the fact that the system doesn’t get in my face with ads or AI or “very important reboots” seems to be a revelation in 2024.

    • poinck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      That was me 2 years ago. Now, I am wondering how I got the work done until now on Win11. It just takes longer and compensation for overtime helps. And by compensation I don’t mean money; I get my time back, working less on other days.

      I will ask for a 4 day workweek. Every day without Windows is a good day. (:

  • proton_lynx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t use Windows anymore. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not one of those “Linux purists”, if other people wanna use Windows, go ahead. But I’m not using it. I swear to god, if it becomes mandatory to use Windows at my company, I’m leaving the next day.

    • Psyhackological@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Hah I don’t have that privilege but same mindset. It is weird to me that in many companies you were deprived of choice at least. Linux can be worse too but let me just try it and see.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        The reason that most companies don’t want you to do that is because they don’t want people running around installing their own OS and doing whatever they feel like on company devices.

        Letting people do that would be an IT and information security nightmare.

        It’s the same reason that no (sane) company would give local admin privileges to everyone.

        The reason why companies generally don’t have an official way to use Linux is because it’s hard to support two platforms simultaneously. Especially when you have, certificate and/or AD network authentication for wireless and wired like we do. You also need to consider how the two platforms should interact with each other. For example Linux devices should be able to connect to the AD domain with Kerberos and need to be able to access SMB shares and probably other systems.

        In short it’s more complicated than “just let me try”.

        • Psyhackological@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I understand your point but I disagree. My senior head of security department uses Linux with Windows VM for Microsoft stuff like Office, Outlook, Teams etc. Besides that many things are handled through configured LDAP with AD and many pain points through Linux and Windows interchangeability is solved through Samba like fileservers. I also hear more and more about FreeIPA thing. I only heard and read of Kerberos that is hard to do.

          For everything else like

          • proxies
          • certificates
          • VPNs

          Everything is the same or even better and more secure on Linux. SSL stuff just comes from it… Even from BSD systems I think that is known for simplicity and security. With so many bloat on Windows there is so much vulnerabilities and things to manage while you can KISS. (Keep It Simple Stupid)

          I don’t need 80% things on Windows but I do have them as I’m forced to and they also are like some ticking security bomb.

          I don’t ask for a perfect Linux support, but at least an ability to do so. I tried it and in the end it came out that Microsoft likes Windows more than Linux (I know surprising). Intune crashed, certificates were weirdly Windows specific and after that I gave up.

          Isn’t freedom about doing whatever you want especially when you want to get as much of your system, hardware so they just can squeeze as much productivity as possible from an employee?

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    Most tech people actually use macs, because corporations prefer them for their tech employees, while the normal employees usually use Windows. Very few corps support linux on the desktop for their admins – even if their infrastructure is all on linux.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Meanwhile folks I work with Linux is basically seen as a must (if not specifically NixOS). You are on your own if you want to use OSs that don’t work well with Nix since there is too much value in immutable builds to warrant supporting your proprietary setup. Most ended up switching to or getting a second laptop for Linux.

    • pathief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      You wish. Most tech companies will get you the cheapest laptop they can get away with.

      I remember being denied a 64bit laptop when developing a 64bit only application lol.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      I used to have a Linux laptop at work. I was even allowed to install my chosen distro. Then the IT department said “we don’t really know Puppet or how to manage Linux, but we know JAMF, so you’re all getting Macs now.”

      My job satisfaction has gone down since then. However, in more positive news, they did end up giving away the old Linux laptops to the employees when they moved office.

        • thejml@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s a support question. It may cost $2k more for a Mac, but if it’s officially supported, auto patched, remote managed and they can prove it with security tools, force patching and restrict users, use standard well known tools for compliance and security monitoring/administration/etc, they will easily save thousands in corp licensing, training costs and legal costs. That $2k+ really becomes negligible.

    • Peffse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Any source on that mac claim? I’ve not seen any proof of that at all.

      (Edit: To clarify, I know people are saying they use MacOS here, but I don’t think the claim that most tech people in corporate settings use MacOS to be true. I only have my personal experience in a very large corporate environment, and am asking for information as every team I’ve worked with was using Windows.)

      • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I used to live in the bay area. Know lots of people in tech companies. Most are on macs.

      • Kualk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I am a software developer and work on Kubernetes based project.

        I was given a Mac laptop when I joined. It was a few OS releases behind, because corporate IT didn’t support newer versions.

        Macs have to run some sort of VM to do docker based development.

        VMs are not that great.

        When time came, I requested a Windows laptop. I installed Debian on WSL 2. Then got it to run systemd properly and installed Docker on WSL. Then vscode on windows host with remote ssh into WSL.

        Vscode ssh integration is probably best least known feature of vscode. However, initial connection setup always requires tweaking to get that best experience.

        By the way, official docker setup is through VM on windows. WSL is not a recommended route, but one can get it working.

        This setup beats Mac any day for me.

        I wish I could run Linux on work laptop, but corporate IT doesn’t know how to deal with it.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I use a Windows laptop because that’s what is supported by our infrastructure, our endpoint protection and our cybersecurity insurance.
    Also, to help test changes before they are rolled out to users.

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    Yes, I use Fedora and love to break the permissions of shared Office-Documents. /s

    The only thing I have learned is not to go too deep into customisation. Because people watching me using hyprland are some kind of disgusted.

    I just use KDE with dark breeze theme. That’s enough and nobody gets hurt.

      • Samsy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        “Disgusted” was a fast choice for wording. They look confused. Someone told me he get a headache by the fast movings through the workspaces.

        For explanation I use 3 or 4 workspaces with full max. Windows and switch through them with super + tab. And had this wiggle animation running, too. As an user it is really fancy but if you are watching, it could hurt.

        • toastal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I mean that sounds like a them problem. Why would your setup, your ergonomics be influenced by others?

  • Synestine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    Right now I’m stuck on a Mac laptop. I hate it, but after our Network team could not manage to get Global Protect working on Linux, and my boss decided keeping them happy was easier than keeping me productive, I didn’t have much choice (Mac or Windows). I’ve worked in environments before where I was able to run Linux on my laptop/workstation, so long as I was able to support myself and do the required work. I used remote desktop (Or a Windows VM) for my Windows work; my browser and Java for most everything else. Now even Office is a shitty webapp for the most part, and Teams “works” on Linux (As much as Teams works at all).

    Even here, I have to wait until Helpdesk manages to build out support for new Mac OS releases, so I’m still on 14.6.

    I told them prior that I would be leaving the company if they forced me to migrate to Mac. I’m currently looking for a better position elsewhere and will tell them exactly why when I turn in my notice. Not that it will change anything, it’ll help me feel better.

    • example@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      that’s odd, my (indirect, reported by others) experience with GlobalProtect on Linux was mostly fine, although when using SAML it only really works with the GUI version and not the CLI version

      • Synestine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s not GP itself that’s he problem, it’s supposed to work on a few mainstream distris, but the Company admins responsible noped out. They had such a hard time making Windows and Mac work that they can’t be bothered for “a couple of Linux users”.