• callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’ll never understand Snickers marketing towards being hungry. It’s a fucking candy bar. I don’t want a fucking candy bar when I’m hungry.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      People need to feel justified.

      “I’m not eating this candy bar because I love sweets; I’m only doing it because my blood sugar is low. It’s not candy, it’s medicine.”

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I use it as a temporary fix if I’m very hungry while I’m out and about and can’t get a meal immediately. It’s more filling than a pure chocolate bar because it has nuts.

    • toofpic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 hours ago

      we had a nightly Friday bike rides in my city, think making a 60 km circle with multiple stops from 00 to 9 a.m.
      I usually took 2-3 king-size snickers with me, because it’s a sourse of carbs that doesn’t take a lot of space and doesn’t cost much (I’m looking at you, “fitness” bars)

    • cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yes, what it is, is a sugar rush that sometimes makes you feel energised if consumed in smaller quantities. But a whole bar is way too sweet for you anyway.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Sugar high has been disproven so many times. If it occurs at all it’s psychosomatic. In children, they get excited because they’re getting a treat and go nuts. None of it is from the sugar.