• Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    99
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    not if those generalizations are against men. they’re already privileged by the patriarchy, so it cancels out

    edit: this got a lot more attention than I anticipated so

    1. thanks for the (You)s and lulz
    2. be reminded that the vast majority of leftists disagree with what I said. my talking points shouldn’t be mistaken for and/or held against leftist viewpoints
    • hakase@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Damn, Poe’s Law hittin this comment hard, and I can’t tell from the instance either.

      Edit: oh Jesus, they were serious. Parody truly is dead. At least we get to publicly shame the stupid misandrist.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Non exaggerated non explicit comments without enough context deserve to be taken seriously. Sadly.

        • Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          2 days ago

          sadly I have to take a comment about how males have more privileges compared to most other groups seriously

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            2 days ago

            O shit you were serious?? Thabks for misinterpreting my comment btw. Let me correct that for you.

            sadly I have to take a comment justifying sexist generalizations on men because males have more privileges compared to most other groups seriously.

            It’s not the part about men having more priviledges that people are having issues with, it’s the part that THAT somehow excuses being sexist against men.

            • Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              2 days ago

              if males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality

              • tjsauce@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                By disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up.

                The words you use are good, but the context is bad.

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Women are privileged by the patriarchy in some ways too, so I guess misogyny’s back on the menu, right? /s

      Dumb misandrist.