I’m looking at people running Deepseek’s 671B R1 locally using NVME drives at 2 tokens a second. So why not skip the FLASH and give me a 1TB drive using a NVME controller and only DRAM behind it? The ultimate transistor count is lower on the silicon side. It would be slower than typical system memory but the same as any NVME with a DRAM cache. The controller architecture for safe page writes in Flash and the internal boost circuitry for pulsing each page is around the same complexity as the memory management unit and constant refresh of DRAM and its power stability requirements. Heck, DDR5 and up is putting power regulation on the system memory already IIRC. Anyone know why this is not a thing or where to get this thing?
I’m talking about volatile memory instead of persistent storage. I think we’re on different pages, no pun intended - lie
a ram drive is volatile memory. you can get higher performance out of DRAM chips attached to the CPU memory controller, versus putting them behind the PCIe bus using NVME. for applications that only work with file systems, a RAM drive works around that limitation. so, why bother?
deleted by creator
What they mean is you can just do something like
mount -t tmpfs -o size=1G tmpfs /mnt/ramdiskto get a file system using regular RAM already.There are few motherboards with enough dram channels to handle a TB of dram. That’s basically why ram drives existed back in the day, and they are still potentially sort of relevant for the same reason. No a TB of ram wouldn’t fit on an m.2 card, but a box of ram with a pcie connector is still an interesting idea. Optane also aimed for this, but it never got enough traction to be viable, so it was scrapped.
You can get motherboards with enough slots if you’re willing to pay enterprise prices for them. I have a system with 1TB of RAM at work that I use as a fast data cache. I just mount tmpfs on it, write hundreds of gigs of data into it (overwriting it all every few hours), and it works great. Cost was somewhere in the $10~15K (US) range a few years ago, IIRC. Steep for an individual, sure, but not crazy for an organization.
Last I saw you had to use super premium ultra dense memory modules to get 1tb into a motherboard. Maybe that’s less so now. But the hope would be to use commodity ram and CPUs etc. 10k for a 1tb system is pretty good. Last I looked it was a lot more.
Pretty sure you can do much better than that now (plus or minus tariff insanity) – quick check on Amazon, NewEgg, etc. suggests ballpark of $5K for 1TB RAM (Registered DDR4) + probably compatible motherboard + CPU.
RAM drives aren’t persistent.
I think OP is looking for fast, temporary storage; like a buffer or a ramdisk.
But, PCIe bus is slower than the memory bus. Just use actual RAM for this.
OP is basically looking for the hypothetical endgame intel optane thats almost as fast as ram. he doesnt however know that the optane project is functionally dead.