I highly doubt the left will do anything uncivil. How can they win back the country? Is it too late?

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This isn’t sides anymore.

    Until America wants to be tolerant of more than intolerance, it seems it will vote with its penises, wallets, and weapons.

    Edit: unnecessary apostrophe

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    you organize to pressure the burgeoise, as always, because they are the ones funding every winning political candidate.

    except for americans fascism seem to be tolerable but god forbid you learn from marxism and socialism.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I highly doubt the left will do anything uncivil.

    Firstly, undestanding what left actually is would be a good start. You’re not talking about the left. You’re talking about liberals. Liberalism isn’t left. Liberalism is right-wing, and always have been.

    The actual left is very happy to be “uncivil.”

    Secondly, a good second step would be to finally accept that liberals, and liberalism in general, has never, and will never, oppose fascism.

    Those are two very basic things you can do right now.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Ekſkyuz M f heziteıtıŋ ėbaut bııŋ frendlı ƿið pıpėl hu “diſėgrı” ðæt Uı hæv ineılıėbél hyumin ruıtſ.

      spoiler

      Excuse me for hesitating about being friendly with people who "disagree* that I have inaliable human rights.

      İf ðiſ z’n dju̇ſt ė muıkrokȯzm v kėnſṙvėtiv pėtṙnėlizm. “Y did’n ækt greıtfᵫl inu̇f t M f letıŋ Y hæv livıŋ privlidjz, ſ nau Y kæn hæv ðem bæk ƿen Y lṙn t pleı nuıſ ƿið M æ a muı frendz hu aṙ teıkıŋ ðem frėm Y!.”

      spoiler

      If this isn’t just a microcosm of conservative paternalism. "You didn’t act grateful enough to me for letting you have living privileges, so now you can have them back when you learn to play nice with me and my friends who are taking them from you.

  • ashok36@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    What do you mean? Trump won decisively. Electoral, popular, in the senate, etc…

    You’re really asking, “how does a minority continue to exist in the face of a fascist majority?”

    The answer is, generally, they don’t.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’m not sure that we do. Not in our lifetimes anyway.

    With a functional justice department we’d have a chance. There’s nothing to stop them from tweaking the electoral lines. There’s nothing to stop them from not certifying an election. We’re about to have the scotus filled with young like-minded Republicans. We’re about to have every federal judge biased for them.

    Even having both sides of Congress the best thing we could do would be to status quo because every time a veto is overturned the scotus could just stamp it down as unconstitutional.

    The president has God King status, he can have opponents jail for executed.

    The thing is even if none of these things were in play, The popular vote just voted for a dictatorship. He was utterly and absolutely clear and anyone that says he was joking around doesn’t actually believe that they’re just too embarrass socially to announce that they themselves are racist/fascist/misogynist. There is nothing here to win back. We’re better than 50% rotten to the core and those people aren’t going away.

    Even this election wasn’t right versus left it’s right versus more right. If you put a true left candidate in they’re just going to get murdered. (That may or may not be literal)

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There’s nothing to stop them from tweaking the electoral lines.

      Given that the Democrats have known the districts have been gerrymandered to hell and back for decades now, why haven’t they spent any time at all doing their own redistricting, rather than strongly pushing agendas that affect 0.5% of the country?

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Oh dems have. But you have to have control of the state to do that. Hogan (R governor) tried his damnest to unwrap central Maryland from Western Maryland.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The first bill filed in the House of Representatives and Senate after the 2020 election which resulted in the Democratic Party gaining nominal control of Congress and the White House was a bill to ban partisan gerrymandering, require independent redistricting committees, forbid states from imposing onerous voter registration or identification regulations, limit the influence of rich donors and wealthy PACs in federal elections, and generally just make the process of voting better for Americans.

        This bill was called the Freedom to Vote Bill and was numbered H.R. 1 and S. 1 for the House and Senate versions, respectively. It passed the House of Representatives in 3 March 2021 and received unanimous support among the 50 Democratic senators when the Senate held its vote on 22 June 2021. The bill was blocked from advancing due to a Republican filibuster.

        On 3 January 2022, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York announced plans to abolish the filibuster for legislation in order to allow this bill to advance. President Joe Biden had previously indicated he would sign the bill. Schumer made his move on 19 January 2022, moving to change the filibuster rule to require continuous talking, i.e. in order to filibuster a bill, someone must make a speech and keep talking for the duration of the filibuster, with the filibuster ending when they finish talking. Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin, members of the Democratic Party representing Arizona and West Virginia, respectively, got squeamish and voted against the change. All Republican senators voted against the change. This doomed the bill’s passage through Congress as the filibuster could be maintained indefinitely by the Republicans.

        The bill died when Congress was dissolved pending the November 2022 general election, in which Republicans won a narrow majority in the House of Representatives.

        Manchin and Sinema’s terms with both expire when the new Congress is convened on 3 January 2025 following the November 2024 general election. Manchin did not seek re-election in yesterday’s election and will retire at the expiration of his term. Sinema was forced out of the Democratic Party and originally planned to stand as an independent before deciding against it. She will retire at the end of her term.

        Due to the innate malapportionment of the Senate, it is exceedingly unlikely that the Democratic Party will ever regain majority control of the Senate.

        So I point my finger at these two idiots for sinking American democracy as we know it.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Even that doesn’t address the mess that exists today. It’s a great example of why they keep losing. They’re going to make it impossible to gerrymander after the lines have already been redrawn to benefit the Republicans? Why? Why would they do that? They’re essentially committing to always fighting an uphill battle for the rest of their days. I respect the principle, but not the approach. You cant lock a scale while it’s broken and then expect it to measure correctly. They need to pull their heads out of their asses and start playing to win. To start recognizing the strategies which continually defeat them, and start countering with some equally aggressive strategies of their own, or their time is done.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I think I phrased my comment wrong on this. It doesn’t ban the act of gerrymandering, it bans the results of gerrymandering. Gerrymandered maps would need to be redrawn had the bill been enacted.

            This bill was no slouch. It directly abridged several states’ voter suppression laws. Had the bill passed, the next phase would have been people being able to use the federal courts to strike back against these incompatible laws.

            That being said, if you were the leader of the Democratic Party, what would you have done? Not intended as rhetorical snark, I’m just curious as to what other ideas there are.

            • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Okay, then that sounds reasonable. Regarding your question, I suppose I would have held a primary and put someone on the final ballot who the people voted for. That would have required acknowledging before the primaries that Biden wasn’t fit to continue, which from what I’ve read, they did have full knowledge of, but refused to act upon.

              That’s easier said than done though. Right? Like I’m not directly exposed to the corruption inherent in the system and the demands placed upon them in order to secure enough campaign funds to have a chance at all. Although I don’t think sticking to the actual system as it was designed would cause the loss of donors.

              Oh, and I’d get rid of the super delegates. In short, I’d stop trying to control who gets on the final ballot to push my party agenda, and instead let the people actually elect the leader they want. Again though, that’s probably a lot easier said than done, and I’m an outsider not privy to the dealings that take place behind closed doors.

              • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I have to agree with you there. I think the Democratic Party was scared of inviting infighting with a primary contest which Harris would probably win anyway, but you’re right—Harris had no mandate from the party membership and even a lightning-round primary conducted online would have been better.

    • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’m not sure that we do. Not in our lifetimes anyway.

      I don’t understand this sentiment as I’m hearing it a lot.

      We’ve elected a fascist into the highest office. We’re cooked. There’s a lot we can do right now, but the most important thing is organizing. Organizing your community, your family, your town/village/city. Organizing mutual aid, direct action, and resistance. How much more do we need until people actually get off their asses and start doing something about it? Like the time for peaceful and democratic means of avoiding fascism was before the election. But a fascist is now in power, so are we going to wait until the troops are rolling down the street to do anything? I’m not saying go out and just commit wanton acts of violence in the name of revolution, but the longer we wait the more difficult it will become to get organized, involved, and yes armed.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I don’t understand this sentiment

        There’s a lot we can do right now, but the most important thing is organizing

        Organizing? Resistance? Armed? That’s honestly insane.

        You’re going to organize against half the US? Gonna start a civil war with every last (fully armed) enemy in your own backyard?

        They could blockade cities from food and shut down any movement in 3 days.

        The Civil War worked efficiently because there was a battlefront. This is more of a Republican Soup.

  • InSamsara@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Blame the democrats for choosing a weak nominee. The left could either whine and burn down every big city or give trump another ear piercing, your choice guys.

  • Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Education, unfortunately those in the most need of it are out of an educational institution so they will only be fed on a diet of commercialism and disinformation.

          • Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            19 hours ago

            The adults that are under educated that voted. I’m saying the dumbing down of America is coming from inside the house by slashing school budgets and how you set education standards. Schools are supposed to operate apolitically but the fact is it is a political institution with political ramifications. Keeping pay low and standards low of what is taught keeps a populace dull and compliant. Educated enough to run the machines at the factory but dumb enough not to ask for more in their lives.

              • Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                I’ll entertain you as I don’t think you are asking this question in good faith. I will have to separate out the 2008 election from the 2020 election.

                In 2008 the election was between Obama and McCain but the rumblings of the symptoms of far right conservatism was boiling up. Tea party and Sarah Palin, remember the clip of McCain having to tell an older voter that Obama wasn’t a secret Kenyan citizen, that is a trump voter right there. It’s just at the time the Republican Party had more of a back bone and was willing to entertain the middle and not play into peoples worst ideas, that has since disappeared.

                The 2008 election was also before citizens united decision . Every election after has been inundated by messaging from private corporations that have their own agenda and want to sway an uneducated populace to vote in their interests. Look at how much money Elon was willing to burn because he thinks that it will benefit him.

                Ok now for 2020 election. Honestly, if there was no pandemic or if Trump had been more responsive to the pandemic I think he would have been reelected. But he fucked up the pandemic response so bad that people were and did get hurt by his incompetence. So people voted him out so that we could actually get the situation under control. That is why Biden won in 2016, things were so bad trump could have lost to a brain dead turnip, democrats could have put anyone up against trump and they would have won.

                This will be my closing, just like roe v wade, this is a case of the dog catching the car. Now that republicans have won now they actually have to lead. In 4 years when nothing has improved in people’s lives they will realize they were bamboozled and are not going to actually be better off.

                I do hope that answers your question. I tried approaching it as academically as I could for you. I do hope you read and digest these words carefully and thoughtfully but is the internet so I’m also expecting a response of a poop emoji too. So good day to you fellow traveler and good luck.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Compulsory but severely underfunded.

            And many of the more right wing religious people lean towards homeschooling, in which they can tailor to what they want their kids to learn (and more damaging) what they don’t want their kids to learn about.

            • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 hours ago

              A lot of abusers homeschool their kids after they get a close call from DCFS because teachers are mandatory reporters.

  • Angrywaffle2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    They will over the next 4 years. Elections swing back and forth. Midterms will probably be greatly fir democrats

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    Democracy is just the tyranny of the majority.

    I think that most of the Americans want this, even if people on the outside do not understand. So in that sense they are right now winning back their country, as confusing as it might sound.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think that most of the Americans want this

      Maybe, but none of the facts directly support this.

      There have been large campaigns to disenfranchise several types of voters for decades in the country. The Electoral College was designed to be unfair to appease Slave states. Voter turnout is abysmal, only about 35% of eligible citizens vote. Out of those turnout is usually around the same percentage. The highest turnout recently was 2020 only because mail in voting was expanded so dramatically, and even then it was only 67% of registered voters, so it was still only 67% of that original 37% of eligible voters. So with the highest recent turnout, we’re looking at about 25% of eligible citizens actually voting.

      • Max@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I believe that the 67% number for the 2020 election is of eligible voters and not registered voters. While turnout is low, it’s not 25% low.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          24 hours ago

          It was ~67% of eligible voters that were registered to vote. Over 94% of registered voters actually voted.

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Dafuk are you talking about? Voter turnout is 67% of all eligible voters. It’s highest since it’s ever been. And Trump won the popular vote. At least look at the facts instead of crying “stolen election”.

    • illi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Democracy really is the worst form of government, just not as bad as all the others…

      Unfortunately in such polarized times like now, even though majority wants this, the ammount of people for which this is unacceptable is only slightly less than “the majority”. And besides, I believe a big part of “the majority” is just gullible enough to be persuaded they want this while it actually goes against their interests

        • Hugin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          20 hours ago

          It’s a famous quote. The contradiction is intentional. It means democracy has a lot of problems and often looks terrible. However when you step back and consider the alternatives they are worse.

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Take it up with Winston Churchil - I was just paraphrasing his quote.

          The point is democracy is terrible, but we don’t have anything better.

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        And if the other candidate won, the other half would’ve been in the same state of “this is unacceptable”. Solutions?

        Cuz lemmy seems to think if their party wins it’s all good and if the other wins it’s the end of the world. While in reality it seems there’s a 50-50 split with each side equally hating the other.

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          It is the limitation of democracy and why it is the worst (except all the others) - because it allows this.

          How to fix this? These would be a good start: don’t polarize the society like this and create us vs. them mentality. In place of power hungry populists have people in charge who want the best for the country. Don’t enable fascists - they never should make it this far. Respect other people. Invest in education so people understand these basics.

          And this is not just about US. It’s scary that this is wherr us got because they are such a big player on the world stage

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, there is a concerted effort by conservatives to use voter suppression to subvert the will of the majority in the US.

      conservatives are clawing back the country right now by hook and by crook.

      can’t go on forever, but I don’t know which is going to last longer: the country or the aging frightened conservatives willing to subvert democracy to hang on to control.

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Isn’t just the aging ones sadly. Lots of young people, especially young men, went for Trump. Andrew Tate has taught them well.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          progressive policies are annually more popular and conservative policies and election results like 2016 and 2024 are won mainly by the old guard funding and utilizing their careful network of voting interference and collusion.

          Andrew Tate is a vile exception amongst younger generations, not the rule.

    • Deadlytosty@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      102
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Normally in Democracy the majority or popular vote wins, however due to the electoral college America has, it doesnt necessarily mean the majority voted for the winner. This was the case for Bush, and some other moments in the past.

      • Fosheze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 day ago

        Trump is winning the popular vote by a pretty decent margin. The electoral college isn’t the issue here.

        • gerbler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          They haven’t finished counting that’s why. Rural areas are faster to count and skew conservative.

          A republican hasn’t won the popular vote in 20 years. Trump is projected to win but like last time he’ll lose the popular vote and win by virtue of the electoral college.

          • Fosheze@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            1 day ago

            All the projections I’m seeing him show him almost certainly winning the popular vote. There’s a gap of 6 million votes and almost every state is over 90% reported in. That gap is going to likely shrink a bit, but unfortunately it almost certainly won’t be enough for him to even lose the popular vote.

            Lets face it, we’re (assuming you’re american) apparently just a country of facists. It looks like GOP is going to have majority in both houses too so here comes project 2025 I guess.

            • gerbler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              24
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              24 hours ago

              Sorry bud, not a yank. You have my sympathies though.

              If it turns out that he does indeed win the popular vote then yeah I’m sorry for your loss. A nest of at least 50% fascists or fascist enablers.

              Heart aches for those that did their civic duty and yet have to suffer the repercussions :(

          • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Wasn’t he ahead in 2016 around this time, but then once all was said and done he was a few mil behind?

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            It looks like turnout is way down compared to last election. Trump is pulling about the same amount he did last time ( maybe a few million down, but there are still results to get). Harris is currently down 15M from where Biden was.

            Trump’s support is no larger than it was last time. Harris’ supporters just didn’t show up

            • superkret@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Harris’ supporters just didn’t show up

              Anyone who didn’t show up is not a Harris supporter.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        66
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Whether it’s 48 or 52 % is an immaterial difference. Every other American who voted, voted for Trump. The rest don’t seem to care either way. He has very broad popular assent and is as popular as Harris give or take a margin of error.

        Everyone is lasered-focused on the EC because it makes all the difference for the practicalities, but if one is to make a broad judgement of whether Trump won fair and square the answer is “yeah, mostly”. Further proof is the fact that the House is probably going to be his as well.

        Americans now bear the collective responsibility for the horrors of the next 4(+?) years. Do not make the mistake of blaming the popular will of outright fascism on institutional failures, because institutions didn’t force half of Americans to vote for the fascist, again.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ll wait 72 hours before settling with it, in case any shenanigans were involved. I expect it’s legitimate, but I want that window open if it’s needed.

      • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I believe the states responsible for those silly outcomes have since passed laws to prevent it happening again.

        Could be wrong, but I listened to a podcast last week with an American professor who’s pretty much written the book, explaining the history of the Electoral College and how it really works. I’m sure he said those states since fixed those loopholes.

        Either way, the damage is done today. Another four years of stupidity in charge.

        • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          This is not correct. The electoral college is exactly as susceptible to giving the win to the person with fewer votes as it was in 2000 and 2016. It’s also not an issue that’s due to any state in particular and is not an issue that can be solved by individual state action. The NPVIC would fix it but requires the cooperation of many states and is not in effect, and has stalled pretty hard in recent years.

              • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Seriously - the whole thing is such a befuddling mess to us non-Americans.

                How exactly can one win the popular vote but not the actual election? From the outside, the reporting I’ve seen always talks about the faithless elector problem (not in those words - just in describing the problems). Is it more to do with how many votes (electors) each state gets, based on population size?

                • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  That’s it, yes - each state gets as many electoral votes as it has congressmen, including senators. Most states award all of their electoral votes to whoever wins the state, with no proportionality to it at all - only two states (Nebraska and Maine, neither one large) do anything proportional with their votes.

                  With a system like that it’s easier to see how things can end up with the less popular candidate winning - they can, for example, sneak by with 50.1% of the vote in just enough states to win, but bomb it out with 20% of the vote in all the other states. That’s an extreme example specifically for the purpose of illustration, but less extreme versions of that are usually what happens.

                  The electoral votes also aren’t distributed entirely fairly - the number of electoral votes per person tends to be larger for less populated states. The less populated states also tend to be Republican states. So in a very real sense, each person’s vote counts for “more” in those states, and “less” in states with high populations. I don’t believe it’s really possible to fix this problem without vastly increasing the number of electoral votes, but congress currently has its size capped at 535 members for what I consider not very good reasons.

                  Yes, the whole system is trash from the ground up. But much of its structure is defined in the constitution itself, which is very difficult to change.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          161
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          How in the fuck.

          Like what drives a majority of Americans to vote for a demented toddler. It’s insane.

          As a kid I always wondered how on Earth did Hitler ever make anyone follow himself, how did those people not realise. Turns out a majority of people are just fucking morons.

          • Wooki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Non mandatory voting wouldnt help, being that its more susceptible to eroding a merit process from campaigns of fear or otherwise.

          • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            The rise of the NSDAP has been studied quite a bit. Also, the psychological aspects are really interesting. Basically normal people can make all of this possible as long as the conditions are just right.

          • Coco@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            There are many leftists and minorities that have “voted strategically” time and time and time again only for things to get worse and worse.

            This kind of disenfranchisement leads to apathy and low turnout.

            We are told from a young age that our vote matters, and then when we are older we are told you can only vote for red fascist or blue fascist and many choose not to participate.

            There are more who did not vote than who voted for Trump. This is not what the majority wants, but with the system as it is, it is not possible for the majority to voice what they actually genuinely want and have a chance to get it.

            The votes do not have to be rigged at the ballot box for voting as a whole system to be rigged.

          • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            78
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Yep and the slow gutting of the education system isn’t making it any better.

            You have an entire generation coming of voting age who are rabid Trump supporters. They don’t care about policies or democracy or public institutions. They don’t care about healthcare, social securities, or the stability of the economy.

            They don’t care about any of the things that have been built up through generations. They lack critical thinking ability.

            The recipe works. If you make dumb kids they will vote for dumb people. It works so well that part of the future plan for a trump presidency is to get rid of the department of education. Solidifying the Republican party indefinitely.

            Without critical thinking and with mass media it’s so easy to say every problem that people deal with is because the “other side” made it so. Even if the other side has been doing everything possible to achieve the opposite.

            • Wooki@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Blaming young people is up their with blaming immigrants and “gays” ect for [insert topic]. I would be very surprised if this was the case.

              I think it’s a little more nuanced.

                • Wooki@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  You sure about that?

                  You have an entire generation coming of voting age who are rabid Trump supporters.

                  It goes on.

                  Anecodtally (at this point, this is all these discussions are), I think that Apathy, fear campaigns or outright money and campaigns ect become powerful levers where voting is non-mandatory.

            • HungryJerboa@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              35
              ·
              24 hours ago

              Americans aren’t special. They’re just as vulnerable to fascism as anybody else.

              The MAGATs might as well be wearing brownshirts and saluting like Mussolini.

          • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            For all practical purposes, about 30% of people are unfeeling morons - basically psychopaths. That’s the number that consistently opposes abortion, for instance. Add to that all the dumbasses who don’t know any better (the undecideds on any extremely obvious moral issue), et voila. That’s how you get slavery, nationalism, genocide, theocracy, you name it.

            Unless people are willing to screen for psychopathy and remove it from the gene pool, the human species will keep fucking around until it finds out. Might be nuclear apocalypse or environmental collapse, but at this rate it’s inevitable.

              • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                “Oh no, we wouldn’t want the psychopaths with the broken brains not to exist. That’s eugenics.”

                You’re all fucking idiots.

        • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          And Harris has done worse than Biden in every county in America.

          Not every state. Every county.

          • WestBromwich@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Perhaps these two factors contributed to this:

            1. Harris is a woman and maybe some Americans just don’t want a female president
            2. Harris maybe leaned too hard on celebrity endorsements, at a time when Americans are feeling worse-off financially, which perhaps made her seem out of touch to middle America
            • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              It’s actually incredible how they tried to copy Hilary Clinton’s campaign tactics of endorsements and warnings about Trump.

              That didn’t work last time. Why would it work now?

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              While I’m sure the statement “some Americans just don’t want a female president” is true, I think the vast majority of them were going to vote Republican basically no matter what.

              To paraphrase the conversation that took place on the left:

              “The DNC isn’t doing well among young straight white men and it’s getting worse. Barack Obama polled at 66% favorable among that demographic in 2008, and that number has fallen every election until now Harris is polling in the low 40s. There’s a lot of them, and we’re losing them.” A hot mic caught Kamala herself saying exactly that. “We’re losing men.”

              Responds the feminists, “Look at the pathetic men throwing a fit because they’re not fully in charge. Something something privilege something something patriarchy. Be better.” I’ll note this didn’t come from Kamala’s campaign, it came from the faceless rabble. The people who said “Yeah no we should probably also talk about issues that are important to men” got shouted down. So white men see that as “The people who vote for this candidate hate me no matter what, and yet they demand my vote no matter what.”

              Kamala started this race as Biden’s running mate, then Biden showed up in “mummified during the 6th dynasty of the Old Kingdom” condition at that first debate. No time for a primary, Biden’s out and Kamala’s in. Now she needs a running mate. They put out an APB for a white guy preferably from the south but the midwest will do. There was some brief discussion of North Carolina governor Roy Cooper, well-liked lame duck democrat from a former confederate state, ticks all those boxes. But we landed on Tim Walz. As far as I can tell he was a genuinely solid choice; I’d never heard of him before he was announced as a short runner for Harris’ running mate. Every headline I read about the guy was some new and exciting way he was a saint. Almost suspiciously so. He’s still the only one on the campaign trail who I’d lend a lawnmower to.

              Problem #1: We heard the APB as it went out. Here’s my turn to get shouted down: This works on women, muslims, and a significant number of black men, because those demographics have an automatic in-group dynamic. You see posts talking about “My boyfriend was talking to me at the gym and a woman I’ve never met before comes up to pretend to be my friend. I see u gurl.” So both Hilary and Kamala had the white chick vote sewn up just for existing while female. Obama, to a slightly lesser extent, had a similar effect among black men. That doesn’t work on white guys, or at least, the white guys that does work on are very reliable Republican voters.

              But, credit where credit is due, Walz seems like a solid guy. If they hadn’t announced out loud they picked him to identity pander I wouldn’t have noticed.

              Problem #2: The next time I saw Walz, he was on a commercial cosplaying as a straight white man. “Governor Walz here in a camouflage hat with a dog. Watch me perform a minor repair on an antique SUV.” They ran ads that literally said “I bet you’re tired of hearing how much white guys suck. I mean, some of them do…” That same ad says “They’re really talkin’ to guys like us.” No they weren’t.

              They ran ads talking about “I’m a REAL MAN and I’m MAN enough to vote for a WOMAN.”

              I didn’t see Tim Walz talking about “The boys who played on my football team are struggling to afford homes. They’re choosing not to get married or have children because for an increasing number of young men it’s just not in the cards.” No I heard a doughy guy dressed like a cowboy say “I eat carburetors for breakfast.”

              Among a male loneliness epidemic they ran an ad that said “Women will withhold sex unless you vote for Harris.”

              Obama polled well among young men because he engaged with them in their spaces. At the time, Facebook and Twitter were where the young people hung out, and he showed up there to talk to us, which was a welcome change from George W. “An internet” Bush. Obama campaigned on messages of hope and progress. I don’t recall Kamala herself really doing much actual reach-out, and her campaign messaging was either lazy attempts at pandering or naked feminist grievance airing. “We need you to show up and vote for us for the second decade in a row even though we’ve done nothing at all to measurably improve your lives in that time, when we had the power to do so we pissed it down your leg, and we’re okay saying out loud that we thoroughly hate you” has proven to be a losing campaign message.

              Turns out there are more straight white men than feminists and queers in the United States voter pool. Hilary proved it and Kamala proved it, pandering exclusively to the former while demanding the support of the former will lose an election to worn out diaper hitler.

              • WestBromwich@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Fair points. Biden won enough men in 2020 though. Maybe Kamala was just seen as too leftist or too focused on women’s issues or something… I’m not saying she was those things, but maybe some people saw her that way.

                • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  If you look back at her primary in 2020, she was.

                  Hard to wash that off with some last minute recanting, like with fracking and other such campaign claims.

                  Her hand was tipped as to her ideal term in office 4 years ago, I’m surprised Trump didn’t use that shit in attack ads given how much more stereotypically progressive she was then.

                  Personally I called it in when a clip of hers saying “we’ve got to get woke” (not sure about the wording but the word woke was used positively) from some talk show aimed at black people from this year came out.

                  You need to live in a parallel dimension to think that word is not absolutely fucking nuclear waste in the political discourse rn.

        • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          And I was so loving Lina Khan’s FTC, asking among other things…

          Edit: autocorrect

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        u̇nfoṙtcėnetlı, H ſımz t bı ƿinıŋ ð pȯpyulṙ vot æz ƿel.

        spoiler

        Unfortunately, he seems to be winning the popular vote as well.

    • C126@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      vote against this and save us all from this idiocy.

      Nope. There was just more people lined up to vote for more idiocy. We failed the world. I’d say I’m sorry, but I don’t think that’ll help. This is America.

      America needs to focus on decentralizing power. That way, when the other side wins, they can’t do much damage. Biggest problem America faces is too much centralized control.

  • jaxxed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I think that first you have to start by admitting two things:

    1. Americans did win their/your election
    2. Americans have l9st faith in their democratic institutions

    After that, you can look at why the Democratic parties fail to appeal to Americans, and try to reform them.

    If you go outside of democracy to gain democracy, then you probably lose what’s left of your democracy.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I didn’t particularly care for all of Harris’s positions and history, but I voted for her. I know many who felt the same. Even considering attacks on ballot drop boxes and such, based on what I’ve read so far, the majority of voting Americans picked the… Well, the one whom appears to have won.

    So, to me, the question is not the one you proposed. The question to me is more along the lines of getting more voters/engagement and the like. To your actual question: they actually got it back and it makes me feel sick and ashamed, but that is the reality as much as I despise it.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    24 hours ago

    They just did. They’ll happily lie in the bed they shat in at first. By the time they realize their mistake, it will be too late.